First slide

NAIA  03 20 23 21:36 PDT       College Lacrosse Ratings


This is the PR Method  Switch to the RPI Method                Full Schedule   Upsets



Championship % are listed as 0.0 until most teams have played four or five games. Tournament seedings are projected based on internal
criteria. Probabilities are based on modified power ratings and the order of team probabilities does not necessarily correspond with the
order of currently listed power ratings

Power Rating (PR)
Explanation 		Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation 		Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation 		Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version 		Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version 		Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version 		Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Reinhardt ( 7 - 1 ) 3 3 1 37 . 0 %
2 Webber International ( 9 - 1 ) 1 13 5 27 . 0 %
3 Indiana Tech ( 5 - 2 ) 2 4 4 19 . 20 %
4 Keiser ( 8 - 0 ) 4 15 2 7 . 20 %
5 Cumberlands ( 7 - 1 ) 6 11 3 4 . 0 %
6 Aquinas ( 3 - 3 ) 7 16 15 1 . 40 %
7 William Penn ( 6 - 4 ) 9 22 14 1 . 40 %
8 Siena Heights ( 2 - 2 ) 5 1 8 0 . 0 %
9 Concordia-Ann Arbor ( 4 - 1 ) 13 25 9 0 . 0 %
10 MVNU ( 4 - 1 ) 17 26 7 0 . 0 %
11 Tennessee Wesleyan ( 4 - 4 ) 16 14 20 0 . 0 %
12 Lawrence Tech ( 2 - 1 ) 8 5 10 0 . 0 %
13 Lourdes ( 4 - 0 ) 18 24 6 0 . 0 %
14 UM-Dearborn ( 4 - 2 ) 22 27 16 0 . 0 %
15 Benedictine (KS) ( 1 - 3 ) 10 12 17 0 . 0 %
16 Clarke ( 2 - 3 ) 29 29 24 0 . 0 %
17 Columbia (MO) ( 0 - 1 ) 11 10 18 0 . 0 %
18 Madonna ( 3 - 3 ) 14 18 19 0 . 0 %
19 Midland ( 0 - 3 ) 24 17 26 0 . 0 %
20 Missouri Baptist ( 0 - 4 ) 26 9 23 0 . 0 %
21 Missouri Valley ( 1 - 5 ) 27 20 29 0 . 0 %
22 Montreat ( 0 - 5 ) 25 7 27 0 . 0 %
23 Ottawa ( 2 - 3 ) 12 6 11 0 . 0 %
24 Point ( 1 - 9 ) 28 28 30 0 . 0 %
25 SCAD ( 1 - 6 ) 19 2 25 0 . 0 %
26 St Ambrose ( 4 - 4 ) 15 8 12 0 . 0 %
27 St Andrews ( 1 - 7 ) 23 21 21 0 . 0 %
28 St Mary (KS) ( 0 - 4 ) 30 23 28 0 . 0 %
29 Westcliff ( 1 - 0 ) 20 30 13 0 . 0 %
30 Taylor ( 2 - 2 ) 21 19 22 0 . 0 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers