2013 NCAA Women's Division II pr

2013 NCAA Women's Division II/NAIA 09 23 22 17:34 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	LIU Post ( 20 - 0 )	1	6	1	42 . 0 %
2	Adelphi ( 18 - 3 )	2	11	4	24 . 0 %
3	West Chester ( 15 - 4 )	3	12	7	9 . 0 %
4	Le Moyne ( 16 - 3 )	4	3	3	6 . 0 %
5	Indiana (PA) ( 13 - 3 )	6	23	10	5 . 0 %
6	Limestone ( 20 - 2 )	5	25	2	5 . 0 %
7	Lock Haven ( 15 - 3 )	7	18	6	3 . 0 %
8	Rollins ( 16 - 2 )	9	14	5	2 . 0 %
9	Bentley ( 11 - 7 )	13	5	15	1 . 0 %
10	Dowling ( 12 - 3 )	8	19	12	1 . 0 %
11	Pfeiffer ( 14 - 3 )	10	33	8	1 . 0 %
12	Stonehill ( 13 - 7 )	11	1	9	1 . 0 %
13	Adams State ( 3 - 10 )	66	52	69	0 . 10 %
14	Alderson-Broaddus ( 0 - 13 )	88	64	88	0 . 10 %
15	American International ( 1 - 15 )	52	24	81	0 . 10 %
16	Aquinas ( 14 - 6 )	63	82	45	0 . 10 %
17	Assumption ( 9 - 8 )	28	13	39	0 . 10 %
18	Belmont Abbey ( 8 - 9 )	35	35	42	0 . 10 %
19	Bloomsburg ( 10 - 8 )	16	8	22	0 . 10 %
20	Bridgeport ( 5 - 10 )	55	42	67	0 . 10 %
21	Catawba ( 5 - 10 )	68	67	66	0 . 10 %
22	Chestnut Hill ( 4 - 13 )	60	49	84	0 . 10 %
23	Chowan ( 2 - 12 )	85	70	76	0 . 10 %
24	Colorado Mesa ( 4 - 11 )	53	50	71	0 . 10 %
25	Converse ( 9 - 9 )	58	60	53	0 . 10 %
26	Davenport ( 8 - 8 )	76	80	65	0 . 10 %
27	Dominican ( 7 - 7 )	41	58	49	0 . 10 %
28	East Stroudsburg ( 3 - 13 )	44	28	75	0 . 10 %
29	Edinboro ( 7 - 10 )	43	44	55	0 . 10 %
30	Emmanuel (GA) ( 2 - 12 )	86	76	82	0 . 10 %
31	Erskine ( 6 - 11 )	65	56	72	0 . 10 %
32	Findlay ( 6 - 12 )	70	65	77	0 . 10 %
33	Florida Southern ( 11 - 4 )	14	27	13	0 . 10 %
34	Fort Lewis ( 7 - 7 )	48	47	41	0 . 10 %
35	Franklin Pierce ( 2 - 11 )	51	10	58	0 . 10 %
36	Gannon ( 10 - 8 )	19	17	30	0 . 10 %
37	Georgian Court ( 8 - 8 )	37	54	59	0 . 10 %
38	Grand Valley State ( 13 - 5 )	26	53	23	0 . 10 %
39	Holy Family ( 13 - 5 )	30	41	27	0 . 10 %
40	Indiana Tech ( 13 - 3 )	61	81	20	0 . 10 %
41	Kutztown ( 3 - 14 )	49	32	79	0 . 10 %
42	Lake Erie ( 13 - 5 )	40	69	31	0 . 10 %
43	Lees-McRae ( 3 - 8 )	71	63	62	0 . 10 %
44	Lenoir-Rhyne ( 7 - 9 )	34	22	37	0 . 10 %
45	Lindenwood ( 15 - 2 )	20	59	11	0 . 10 %
46	Lindenwood-Belleville ( 0 - 6 )	89	86	56	0 . 10 %
47	McKendree ( 1 - 14 )	74	43	89	0 . 10 %
48	Mercy ( 7 - 7 )	31	34	46	0 . 10 %
49	Mercyhurst ( 12 - 6 )	18	26	18	0 . 10 %
50	Merrimack ( 5 - 11 )	23	2	47	0 . 10 %
51	Midland ( 9 - 7 )	79	90	48	0 . 10 %
52	Millersville ( 9 - 7 )	27	37	36	0 . 10 %
53	Mo. Baptist ( 5 - 7 )	83	89	63	0 . 10 %
54	Molloy ( 9 - 8 )	17	15	33	0 . 10 %
55	Mount Olive ( 9 - 8 )	57	62	50	0 . 10 %
56	New Haven ( 12 - 7 )	12	4	14	0 . 10 %
57	Newberry ( 8 - 9 )	62	66	60	0 . 10 %
58	Notre Dame (OH) ( 10 - 6 )	50	73	40	0 . 10 %
59	Nyack ( 0 - 12 )	81	51	85	0 . 10 %
60	Oklahoma Baptist ( 1 - 2 )	90	87	26	0 . 10 %
61	Philadelphia ( 14 - 5 )	25	39	17	0 . 10 %
62	Post ( 2 - 13 )	67	55	86	0 . 10 %
63	Queens ( 10 - 10 )	29	21	34	0 . 10 %
64	Queens (NY) ( 10 - 6 )	22	31	28	0 . 10 %
65	Regis (CO) ( 10 - 5 )	24	46	29	0 . 10 %
66	Reinhardt ( 3 - 9 )	82	85	52	0 . 10 %
67	Robert Morris (IL) ( 14 - 4 )	69	88	24	0 . 10 %
68	Roberts Wesleyan ( 7 - 9 )	47	30	51	0 . 10 %
69	S. New Hampshire ( 7 - 10 )	32	7	43	0 . 10 %
70	Saint Anselm ( 10 - 7 )	15	9	25	0 . 10 %
71	Saint Leo ( 8 - 7 )	46	36	32	0 . 10 %
72	Saint Michael's ( 5 - 10 )	42	16	54	0 . 10 %
73	Savannah Art & Design ( 14 - 3 )	59	79	16	0 . 10 %
74	Seton Hill ( 3 - 1 )	21	48	19	0 . 10 %
75	Shepherd ( 10 - 6 )	36	57	35	0 . 10 %
76	Shippensburg ( 5 - 12 )	38	29	70	0 . 10 %
77	Shorter ( 11 - 5 )	64	77	38	0 . 10 %
78	Siena Heights ( 1 - 15 )	84	78	90	0 . 10 %
79	Slippery Rock ( 8 - 8 )	39	38	44	0 . 10 %
80	Southern Connecticut ( 3 - 13 )	54	20	74	0 . 10 %
81	St. Andrews ( 10 - 10 )	77	83	73	0 . 10 %
82	St. Thomas Aquinas ( 11 - 4 )	33	40	21	0 . 10 %
83	Tennessee Wesleyan ( 7 - 10 )	78	84	68	0 . 10 %
84	Tiffin ( 10 - 9 )	45	61	57	0 . 10 %
85	Urbana ( 3 - 11 )	73	74	78	0 . 10 %
86	Walsh ( 2 - 8 )	87	71	64	0 . 10 %
87	West Virginia Wesleyan ( 4 - 11 )	75	75	61	0 . 10 %
88	Wheeling Jesuit ( 5 - 13 )	72	68	83	0 . 10 %
89	Wilmington ( 4 - 13 )	56	45	80	0 . 10 %
90	Young Harris ( 1 - 16 )	80	72	87	0 . 10 %