Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2005 NCAA Women's Division II  10 02 22 29:53 PDT


Switch to Power Rating Method
Rating Percentage Index (RPI)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Tournament Selection
Explanation
Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team RPI SOS QWF Selection Sum
1 West Chester ( 16 - 2 ) 2 1 2 5
2 Adelphi ( 14 - 2 ) 3 4 3 10
3 Anne Arundel ( 14 - 2 ) 1 9 2 12
4 Lock Haven ( 13 - 5 ) 6 3 5 14
5 Bloomsburg ( 12 - 6 ) 7 2 7 16
6 Stonehill ( 21 - 0 ) 1 22 1 24
7 C.W. Post ( 13 - 3 ) 4 20 4 28
8 Gannon ( 10 - 4 ) 8 12 8 28
9 Merrimack ( 12 - 3 ) 5 18 6 29
10 Harford ( 3 - 10 ) 10 10 11 31
11 Bryant ( 12 - 5 ) 10 14 11 35
12 Regis (CO) ( 1 - 6 ) 14 6 15 35
13 Limestone ( 10 - 6 ) 11 19 9 39
14 Assumption ( 7 - 9 ) 15 5 21 41
15 New Haven ( 7 - 8 ) 17 9 16 42
16 Pfeiffer ( 11 - 4 ) 9 24 10 43
17 Philadelphia ( 10 - 6 ) 12 21 12 45
18 East Stroudsburg ( 7 - 9 ) 18 7 22 47
19 Queens ( 11 - 6 ) 13 23 13 49
20 Saint Michael's ( 6 - 7 ) 16 16 17 49
21 Millersville ( 5 - 9 ) 21 8 24 53
22 Colorado College ( 12 - 2 ) 7 42 5 54
23 Mercyhurst ( 6 - 9 ) 19 11 26 56
24 American International ( 4 - 8 ) 22 17 27 66
25 Lees-McRae ( 3 - 13 ) 24 15 29 68
26 Indiana (PA) ( 2 - 14 ) 26 10 33 69
27 S. New Hampshire ( 6 - 8 ) 25 27 19 71
28 Shippensburg ( 1 - 15 ) 27 13 34 74
29 Bentley ( 6 - 8 ) 20 30 25 75
30 Saint Anselm ( 5 - 10 ) 23 28 28 79
31 Saint Vincent ( 4 - 8 ) 28 32 20 80
32 Wilmington ( 9 - 3 ) 34 35 14 83
33 Seton Hill ( 3 - 4 ) 33 33 18 84
34 Southern Connecticut ( 3 - 10 ) 29 26 30 85
35 St. Andrews ( 2 - 12 ) 30 25 32 87

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers