Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2004 NCAA Women's Division II  09 23 22 17:22 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Longwood ( 14 - 1 ) 1 2 4 46 . 0 %
2 UC Davis ( 12 - 5 ) 2 1 8 31 . 0 %
3 Adelphi ( 13 - 1 ) 4 17 3 13 . 0 %
4 West Chester ( 18 - 3 ) 3 9 1 6 . 0 %
5 Stonehill ( 14 - 3 ) 5 22 5 2 . 0 %
6 Bloomsburg ( 9 - 9 ) 8 7 13 1 . 0 %
7 C.W. Post ( 14 - 1 ) 6 15 2 1 . 0 %
8 American International ( 6 - 6 ) 28 31 18 0 . 10 %
9 Assumption ( 3 - 10 ) 26 25 28 0 . 10 %
10 Bentley ( 6 - 7 ) 23 26 20 0 . 10 %
11 Bryant ( 12 - 6 ) 15 23 11 0 . 10 %
12 East Stroudsburg ( 4 - 13 ) 22 18 29 0 . 10 %
13 Franklin Pierce ( 3 - 13 ) 30 27 32 0 . 10 %
14 Gannon ( 9 - 5 ) 10 4 10 0 . 10 %
15 Indiana (PA) ( 2 - 15 ) 27 16 31 0 . 10 %
16 Lees-McRae ( 5 - 7 ) 24 8 22 0 . 10 %
17 Limestone ( 13 - 4 ) 7 10 6 0 . 10 %
18 Lock Haven ( 8 - 9 ) 13 14 14 0 . 10 %
19 Mercyhurst ( 5 - 10 ) 21 12 26 0 . 10 %
20 Merrimack ( 10 - 6 ) 16 30 15 0 . 10 %
21 Millersville ( 6 - 10 ) 14 20 21 0 . 10 %
22 New Haven ( 6 - 7 ) 17 24 16 0 . 10 %
23 Pfeiffer ( 11 - 4 ) 11 5 7 0 . 10 %
24 Philadelphia ( 7 - 6 ) 9 6 12 0 . 10 %
25 Queens ( 7 - 8 ) 18 19 23 0 . 10 %
26 Regis ( 2 - 10 ) 19 3 24 0 . 10 %
27 S. New Hampshire ( 0 - 10 ) 32 33 33 0 . 10 %
28 Saint Anselm ( 6 - 8 ) 25 29 25 0 . 10 %
29 Saint Michael's ( 9 - 8 ) 20 28 17 0 . 10 %
30 Saint Vincent ( 5 - 7 ) 29 21 19 0 . 10 %
31 Shippensburg ( 10 - 5 ) 12 13 9 0 . 10 %
32 Southern Connecticut ( 2 - 10 ) 31 32 30 0 . 10 %
33 St. Andrews ( 1 - 11 ) 33 11 27 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers