Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2016 NCAA Men's Division II  09 23 22 17:10 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Limestone ( 21 - 1 ) 1 15 2 51 . 0 %
2 Le Moyne ( 20 - 0 ) 2 4 1 28 . 0 %
3 Merrimack ( 15 - 3 ) 3 1 3 8 . 0 %
4 NYIT ( 13 - 5 ) 4 7 7 8 . 0 %
5 Adelphi ( 12 - 5 ) 5 2 8 2 . 0 %
6 Tampa ( 15 - 3 ) 6 5 4 2 . 0 %
7 Mercyhurst ( 15 - 3 ) 8 22 6 1 . 0 %
8 Adams State ( 4 - 10 ) 49 43 52 0 . 10 %
9 Alabama Huntsville ( 3 - 9 ) 64 64 49 0 . 10 %
10 Alderson Broaddus ( 5 - 10 ) 45 56 47 0 . 10 %
11 American International ( 1 - 14 ) 59 14 62 0 . 10 %
12 Assumption ( 3 - 11 ) 35 3 42 0 . 10 %
13 Belmont Abbey ( 12 - 4 ) 13 50 13 0 . 10 %
14 Bentley ( 6 - 7 ) 27 6 27 0 . 10 %
15 Brevard ( 2 - 13 ) 56 59 64 0 . 10 %
16 Catawba ( 5 - 10 ) 44 51 53 0 . 10 %
17 Chestnut Hill ( 6 - 7 ) 28 23 31 0 . 10 %
18 Coker ( 5 - 11 ) 51 44 59 0 . 10 %
19 Colorado Mesa ( 13 - 4 ) 24 48 20 0 . 10 %
20 CSU Pueblo ( 3 - 11 ) 54 58 61 0 . 10 %
21 Davis & Elkins ( 0 - 9 ) 65 63 54 0 . 10 %
22 Dominican C. ( 3 - 12 ) 55 27 46 0 . 10 %
23 Dowling ( 10 - 5 ) 9 16 10 0 . 10 %
24 Emmanuel (GA) ( 1 - 14 ) 61 47 65 0 . 10 %
25 Florida Southern ( 9 - 9 ) 30 10 36 0 . 10 %
26 Florida Tech ( 6 - 7 ) 37 17 34 0 . 10 %
27 Franklin Pierce ( 5 - 8 ) 33 18 35 0 . 10 %
28 Georgian Court ( 2 - 13 ) 57 46 63 0 . 10 %
29 Indianapolis ( 8 - 6 ) 31 39 29 0 . 10 %
30 Lake Erie ( 9 - 6 ) 14 8 15 0 . 10 %
31 Lees-McRae ( 3 - 12 ) 62 53 57 0 . 10 %
32 Lenoir-Rhyne ( 12 - 4 ) 20 32 14 0 . 10 %
33 Lincoln Memorial ( 6 - 6 ) 50 61 38 0 . 10 %
34 Lindenwood ( 10 - 6 ) 19 35 22 0 . 10 %
35 LIU Post ( 12 - 4 ) 7 19 5 0 . 10 %
36 Lynn ( 10 - 5 ) 17 31 23 0 . 10 %
37 Mars Hill ( 4 - 11 ) 53 54 60 0 . 10 %
38 Mercy ( 9 - 6 ) 18 36 18 0 . 10 %
39 Molloy ( 10 - 5 ) 16 26 16 0 . 10 %
40 Mount Olive ( 13 - 5 ) 11 20 9 0 . 10 %
41 North Greenville ( 5 - 10 ) 52 52 50 0 . 10 %
42 Notre Dame de Namur ( 3 - 9 ) 63 62 55 0 . 10 %
43 Ohio Valley ( 3 - 9 ) 60 55 45 0 . 10 %
44 Pace ( 11 - 6 ) 12 29 19 0 . 10 %
45 Pfeiffer ( 8 - 7 ) 40 34 30 0 . 10 %
46 Post ( 6 - 8 ) 38 41 39 0 . 10 %
47 Queens U of Charlotte ( 11 - 7 ) 22 33 32 0 . 10 %
48 Roberts Wesleyan ( 3 - 13 ) 47 30 58 0 . 10 %
49 Rockhurst ( 9 - 8 ) 41 37 44 0 . 10 %
50 Rollins ( 10 - 6 ) 25 24 24 0 . 10 %
51 S. New Hampshire ( 10 - 6 ) 23 9 12 0 . 10 %
52 Saint Anselm ( 8 - 6 ) 15 13 21 0 . 10 %
53 Saint Leo ( 9 - 5 ) 21 40 25 0 . 10 %
54 Saint Michael's ( 5 - 9 ) 32 11 37 0 . 10 %
55 Saint Rose ( 3 - 13 ) 34 12 56 0 . 10 %
56 Saint Thomas Aquinas ( 0 - 12 ) 58 28 51 0 . 10 %
57 Seton Hill ( 11 - 4 ) 10 21 11 0 . 10 %
58 Shorter ( 7 - 7 ) 48 60 41 0 . 10 %
59 Tusculum ( 5 - 10 ) 42 45 48 0 . 10 %
60 U. of DC ( 4 - 8 ) 46 38 40 0 . 10 %
61 Walsh ( 5 - 10 ) 39 25 43 0 . 10 %
62 Westminster ( 13 - 3 ) 29 57 17 0 . 10 %
63 Wheeling Jesuit ( 7 - 5 ) 26 49 26 0 . 10 %
64 Wingate ( 10 - 6 ) 36 42 28 0 . 10 %
65 Young Harris ( 10 - 5 ) 43 65 33 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers