Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2015 NCAA Men's Division II  09 23 22 17:08 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Limestone ( 20 - 1 ) 1 11 1 35 . 0 %
2 Le Moyne ( 16 - 3 ) 2 1 3 27 . 0 %
3 Merrimack ( 13 - 3 ) 4 3 5 14 . 0 %
4 Adelphi ( 15 - 3 ) 3 2 4 12 . 0 %
5 Lake Erie ( 15 - 3 ) 5 4 2 3 . 0 %
6 LIU Post ( 14 - 3 ) 7 15 7 2 . 0 %
7 NYIT ( 12 - 4 ) 6 16 9 2 . 0 %
8 Colorado Mesa ( 10 - 3 ) 12 46 11 1 . 0 %
9 Lenoir-Rhyne ( 9 - 7 ) 15 22 27 1 . 0 %
10 Mount Olive ( 11 - 5 ) 17 25 12 1 . 0 %
11 Pace ( 9 - 7 ) 16 9 22 1 . 0 %
12 Seton Hill ( 9 - 5 ) 8 10 13 1 . 0 %
13 Adams State ( 4 - 11 ) 43 32 40 0 . 10 %
14 Alderson Broaddus ( 4 - 9 ) 51 52 38 0 . 10 %
15 American International ( 2 - 13 ) 50 24 56 0 . 10 %
16 Assumption ( 9 - 8 ) 28 19 29 0 . 10 %
17 Belmont Abbey ( 11 - 5 ) 19 40 15 0 . 10 %
18 Bentley ( 6 - 7 ) 26 13 26 0 . 10 %
19 Brevard ( 8 - 8 ) 46 55 36 0 . 10 %
20 Catawba ( 5 - 10 ) 39 31 45 0 . 10 %
21 Chestnut Hill ( 6 - 7 ) 34 33 30 0 . 10 %
22 Coker ( 9 - 5 ) 29 36 21 0 . 10 %
23 CSU Pueblo ( 1 - 11 ) 56 42 53 0 . 10 %
24 Dominican C. ( 1 - 12 ) 53 45 54 0 . 10 %
25 Dowling ( 5 - 8 ) 31 21 32 0 . 10 %
26 Emmanuel (GA) ( 3 - 10 ) 55 47 42 0 . 10 %
27 Florida Southern ( 6 - 8 ) 24 18 33 0 . 10 %
28 Florida Tech ( 12 - 4 ) 21 30 16 0 . 10 %
29 Franklin Pierce ( 12 - 4 ) 23 27 10 0 . 10 %
30 Lees-McRae ( 2 - 14 ) 59 51 57 0 . 10 %
31 Lincoln Memorial ( 4 - 10 ) 49 58 52 0 . 10 %
32 Lindenwood ( 14 - 4 ) 11 23 6 0 . 10 %
33 Lynn ( 8 - 7 ) 35 43 34 0 . 10 %
34 Mars Hill ( 10 - 6 ) 13 38 23 0 . 10 %
35 Mercy ( 10 - 7 ) 18 26 25 0 . 10 %
36 Mercyhurst ( 8 - 6 ) 10 14 17 0 . 10 %
37 Molloy ( 11 - 4 ) 22 39 14 0 . 10 %
38 North Greenville ( 1 - 14 ) 57 49 58 0 . 10 %
39 Notre Dame de Namur ( 3 - 12 ) 54 57 46 0 . 10 %
40 Ohio Valley ( 0 - 15 ) 58 44 59 0 . 10 %
41 Pfeiffer ( 10 - 5 ) 14 29 18 0 . 10 %
42 Post ( 6 - 8 ) 45 53 41 0 . 10 %
43 Queens U. of Charlotte ( 9 - 8 ) 27 6 19 0 . 10 %
44 Roberts Wesleyan ( 4 - 11 ) 44 41 48 0 . 10 %
45 Rockhurst ( 7 - 5 ) 38 56 24 0 . 10 %
46 Rollins ( 6 - 10 ) 30 20 47 0 . 10 %
47 S. New Hampshire ( 2 - 13 ) 36 8 55 0 . 10 %
48 Saint Anselm ( 2 - 11 ) 41 5 50 0 . 10 %
49 Saint Leo ( 7 - 7 ) 25 28 31 0 . 10 %
50 Saint Michael's ( 7 - 7 ) 33 7 28 0 . 10 %
51 Saint Rose ( 4 - 10 ) 32 12 43 0 . 10 %
52 Shorter ( 8 - 7 ) 42 54 37 0 . 10 %
53 Tampa ( 15 - 4 ) 9 17 8 0 . 10 %
54 Tusculum ( 5 - 8 ) 40 50 39 0 . 10 %
55 U. of DC ( 2 - 9 ) 52 37 49 0 . 10 %
56 Walsh ( 3 - 10 ) 48 35 44 0 . 10 %
57 Wheeling Jesuit ( 8 - 6 ) 20 48 20 0 . 10 %
58 Wingate ( 6 - 10 ) 37 34 51 0 . 10 %
59 Young Harris ( 9 - 7 ) 47 59 35 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers