Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2014 NCAA Men's Division II  09 23 22 17:05 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Limestone ( 19 - 1 ) 1 3 1 37 . 0 %
2 Tampa ( 16 - 3 ) 3 14 3 14 . 0 %
3 Le Moyne ( 13 - 3 ) 2 9 4 13 . 0 %
4 Adelphi ( 17 - 2 ) 4 6 2 7 . 0 %
5 Lenoir-Rhyne ( 10 - 4 ) 10 41 19 4 . 0 %
6 LIU Post ( 11 - 6 ) 5 1 6 4 . 0 %
7 Mercyhurst ( 12 - 4 ) 9 19 7 4 . 0 %
8 NYIT ( 12 - 4 ) 8 17 5 4 . 0 %
9 Dominican U. ( 9 - 3 ) 13 39 17 2 . 0 %
10 Florida Southern ( 11 - 4 ) 7 7 12 2 . 0 %
11 Lake Erie ( 10 - 4 ) 11 28 13 2 . 0 %
12 Merrimack ( 12 - 5 ) 12 4 8 2 . 0 %
13 Mount Olive ( 13 - 3 ) 15 45 11 1 . 0 %
14 Pfeiffer ( 9 - 5 ) 14 2 14 1 . 0 %
15 Queens U. of Charlotte ( 12 - 5 ) 16 5 10 1 . 0 %
16 Seton Hill ( 10 - 6 ) 17 18 18 1 . 0 %
17 Wheeling Jesuit ( 10 - 3 ) 18 42 16 1 . 0 %
18 Adams State ( 4 - 8 ) 37 54 29 0 . 10 %
19 Alderson Broaddus ( 0 - 14 ) 54 44 56 0 . 10 %
20 American International ( 2 - 14 ) 41 35 54 0 . 10 %
21 Assumption ( 5 - 9 ) 38 31 42 0 . 10 %
22 Belmont Abbey ( 6 - 10 ) 25 27 39 0 . 10 %
23 Bentley ( 8 - 7 ) 23 11 21 0 . 10 %
24 Brevard ( 3 - 10 ) 53 48 49 0 . 10 %
25 Catawba ( 7 - 8 ) 26 8 27 0 . 10 %
26 Chestnut Hill ( 7 - 6 ) 22 22 20 0 . 10 %
27 Coker ( 6 - 8 ) 39 36 41 0 . 10 %
28 Colorado Mesa ( 9 - 3 ) 21 47 15 0 . 10 %
29 Dominican C. ( 1 - 13 ) 50 30 51 0 . 10 %
30 Dowling ( 12 - 5 ) 6 10 9 0 . 10 %
31 Florida Tech ( 3 - 9 ) 28 24 44 0 . 10 %
32 Franklin Pierce ( 6 - 7 ) 35 38 30 0 . 10 %
33 Lees-McRae ( 0 - 14 ) 56 40 53 0 . 10 %
34 Lindenwood ( 5 - 7 ) 29 46 32 0 . 10 %
35 Lynn ( 1 - 10 ) 51 29 48 0 . 10 %
36 Mars Hill ( 7 - 8 ) 24 25 25 0 . 10 %
37 Mercy ( 10 - 6 ) 30 49 22 0 . 10 %
38 Molloy ( 8 - 6 ) 20 37 24 0 . 10 %
39 Notre Dame de Namur ( 8 - 8 ) 47 15 45 0 . 10 %
40 Ohio Valley ( 2 - 14 ) 52 51 55 0 . 10 %
41 Pace ( 5 - 7 ) 32 33 33 0 . 10 %
42 Post ( 4 - 11 ) 46 52 50 0 . 10 %
43 Roberts Wesleyan ( 6 - 9 ) 40 34 31 0 . 10 %
44 Rockhurst ( 1 - 8 ) 55 32 34 0 . 10 %
45 Rollins ( 6 - 9 ) 31 12 37 0 . 10 %
46 S. New Hampshire ( 7 - 8 ) 34 21 35 0 . 10 %
47 Saint Anselm ( 6 - 9 ) 33 16 38 0 . 10 %
48 Saint Leo ( 8 - 7 ) 19 13 23 0 . 10 %
49 Saint Michael's ( 4 - 10 ) 36 20 46 0 . 10 %
50 Saint Rose ( 2 - 12 ) 42 23 52 0 . 10 %
51 Shorter ( 7 - 7 ) 43 55 36 0 . 10 %
52 Tusculum ( 5 - 8 ) 44 53 43 0 . 10 %
53 U. of DC ( 3 - 8 ) 45 26 28 0 . 10 %
54 Walsh ( 4 - 7 ) 48 43 40 0 . 10 %
55 Wingate ( 7 - 6 ) 27 50 26 0 . 10 %
56 Young Harris ( 5 - 9 ) 49 56 47 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers