2010 NCAA Men's Division II pr

2010 NCAA Men's Division II 09 22 22 33:58 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	C.W. Post ( 16 - 1 )	2	16	2	22 . 0 %
2	Mercyhurst ( 13 - 1 )	1	34	6	22 . 0 %
3	Le Moyne ( 15 - 2 )	4	1	1	20 . 0 %
4	Dowling ( 12 - 2 )	3	22	5	15 . 0 %
5	Limestone ( 12 - 2 )	5	11	3	6 . 0 %
6	Merrimack ( 13 - 3 )	7	5	4	5 . 0 %
7	NYIT ( 9 - 4 )	6	17	8	4 . 0 %
8	Bentley ( 9 - 5 )	8	2	10	2 . 0 %
9	Seton Hill ( 10 - 4 )	12	31	12	2 . 0 %
10	Pace ( 7 - 7 )	17	20	18	1 . 0 %
11	Saint Leo ( 12 - 3 )	10	26	7	1 . 0 %
12	Adelphi ( 10 - 5 )	11	14	13	0 . 10 %
13	American International ( 3 - 13 )	31	21	37	0 . 10 %
14	Assumption ( 4 - 10 )	25	27	33	0 . 10 %
15	Belmont Abbey ( 7 - 6 )	15	24	15	0 . 10 %
16	Catawba ( 9 - 8 )	19	6	14	0 . 10 %
17	Chestnut Hill ( 4 - 11 )	37	13	34	0 . 10 %
18	Dominican C. ( 6 - 10 )	22	28	21	0 . 10 %
19	Dominican U. ( 4 - 7 )	34	37	29	0 . 10 %
20	Florida Southern ( 4 - 9 )	18	8	22	0 . 10 %
21	Franklin Pierce ( 5 - 8 )	32	10	23	0 . 10 %
22	Grand Canyon ( 5 - 10 )	36	35	35	0 . 10 %
23	Lake Erie ( 3 - 11 )	35	19	36	0 . 10 %
24	Lees-McRae ( 3 - 8 )	33	33	28	0 . 10 %
25	Mars Hill ( 10 - 4 )	9	23	11	0 . 10 %
26	Mercy ( 5 - 10 )	30	30	30	0 . 10 %
27	Molloy ( 5 - 9 )	21	29	24	0 . 10 %
28	Notre Dame de Namur ( 6 - 8 )	24	36	17	0 . 10 %
29	Pfeiffer ( 8 - 9 )	20	32	20	0 . 10 %
30	Queens U. of Charlotte ( 9 - 4 )	13	15	9	0 . 10 %
31	Rollins ( 3 - 9 )	26	12	26	0 . 10 %
32	S. New Hampshire ( 4 - 10 )	23	3	25	0 . 10 %
33	Saint Anselm ( 7 - 8 )	16	9	19	0 . 10 %
34	Saint Michael's ( 6 - 7 )	14	7	16	0 . 10 %
35	St. Andrews ( 3 - 10 )	29	4	27	0 . 10 %
36	Wheeling Jesuit ( 4 - 10 )	27	25	31	0 . 10 %
37	Wingate ( 4 - 11 )	28	18	32	0 . 10 %