Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2004 NCAA Men's Division II  09 22 22 33:50 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 NYIT ( 11 - 2 ) 1 4 3 37 . 0 %
2 Limestone ( 15 - 2 ) 2 11 2 27 . 0 %
3 Le Moyne ( 16 - 0 ) 3 14 1 20 . 0 %
4 Mercyhurst ( 11 - 2 ) 4 7 5 8 . 0 %
5 Adelphi ( 7 - 4 ) 5 3 6 7 . 0 %
6 Dowling ( 8 - 7 ) 8 2 8 1 . 0 %
7 American International ( 0 - 11 ) 31 24 31 0 . 10 %
8 Assumption ( 4 - 11 ) 25 28 25 0 . 10 %
9 Bentley ( 11 - 4 ) 14 23 7 0 . 10 %
10 Bryant ( 12 - 5 ) 6 13 4 0 . 10 %
11 C. W. Post ( 5 - 9 ) 10 1 13 0 . 10 %
12 Catawba ( 10 - 6 ) 12 22 11 0 . 10 %
13 Dominican College ( 4 - 10 ) 28 30 23 0 . 10 %
14 Franklin Pierce ( 3 - 12 ) 30 27 29 0 . 10 %
15 Green Mountain ( 7 - 2 ) 26 31 16 0 . 10 %
16 Lees-McRae ( 2 - 10 ) 29 9 27 0 . 10 %
17 Mars Hill ( 2 - 10 ) 27 10 28 0 . 10 %
18 Merrimack ( 6 - 8 ) 20 26 21 0 . 10 %
19 Molloy ( 9 - 6 ) 11 20 12 0 . 10 %
20 Notre Dame de Namur ( 7 - 7 ) 17 29 17 0 . 10 %
21 Pace ( 9 - 5 ) 9 18 10 0 . 10 %
22 Pfeiffer ( 6 - 8 ) 23 12 19 0 . 10 %
23 Queens U. of Charlotte ( 3 - 11 ) 24 19 30 0 . 10 %
24 S. New Hampshire ( 6 - 7 ) 18 21 18 0 . 10 %
25 Saint Anselm ( 4 - 9 ) 22 25 26 0 . 10 %
26 Saint Michael's ( 4 - 10 ) 19 15 24 0 . 10 %
27 Saint Vincent ( 9 - 3 ) 7 8 9 0 . 10 %
28 Southampton ( 7 - 7 ) 13 5 14 0 . 10 %
29 St. Andrews ( 8 - 8 ) 16 17 20 0 . 10 %
30 Wheeling Jesuit ( 7 - 7 ) 15 6 15 0 . 10 %
31 Wingate ( 4 - 8 ) 21 16 22 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers