UPDATED: 02-05-26 16:45 PDT

men Coker 2
  
Coker                 
W-L: ( 1- 0) PR = 98.6643

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 130 H Barton Carolinas ( 1- 1, 98.7) 11-10 3o 207 A Lander PBC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 212 H Emmanuel (GA) Carolinas ( 0- 2, 92.7) 214 H Chowan Carolinas ( 0- 0, 96.7) 220 H Emory & Henry SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 228 A Young Harris Carolinas ( 0- 1, 92.0) 304 H Wingate SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 309 H Shorter PBC ( 0- 1, 96.7) 314 H Lincoln Memorial SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 318 A Newberry SAC ( 1- 1, 97.9) 321 H Anderson (SC) SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 328 A Tusculum SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 401 H Catawba SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 411 A Mars Hill SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7) 418 A Lenoir-Rhyne SAC ( 0- 0, 96.7)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   130 H Barton                 11-10 3o    1     1           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Coker Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Adams State Coker   Coker
Adelphi Coker   Coker
AIC Coker   Coker
Anderson (SC) Coker   Coker
Assumption Coker   Coker
Barton Coker Coker  
Belmont Abbey Coker   Coker
Bentley Coker   Coker
Bport Coker   Coker
Caldwell Coker   Coker
Catawba Coker   Coker
Chestnut Hill Coker   Coker
Chowan Coker   Coker
CO Mesa Coker   Coker
CUI Coker   Coker
Davenport Coker   Coker
Davis & Elkins Coker   Coker
Dominican (NY) Coker   Coker
DUC Coker   Coker
D'Youville Coker   Coker
Emmanuel (GA) Coker   Coker
Emory & Henry Coker   Coker
ERAU Coker   Coker
Felician Coker   Coker
FL Southern Coker   Coker
FL Tech Coker   Coker
Flagler Coker   Coker
FPU Coker   Coker
Frostburg State Coker   Coker
GCU Coker   Coker
Holy Family Coker   Coker
Indy Coker   Coker
Lake Erie Coker   Coker
Lander Coker   Coker
Lees-McRae Coker   Coker
Lenoir-Rhyne Coker   Coker
Lewis Lewis   Lewis
Lincoln Memorial Coker   Coker
Lynn Coker   Coker
Malone Coker   Coker
Mars Hill Coker   Coker
Maryville Coker   Coker
Mercy Coker   Coker
Molloy Coker   Coker
Montevallo Montevallo   Montevallo
Mt Olive Coker   Coker
Newberry Coker   Coker
NGU Coker   Coker
Northwood Coker   Coker
NW Nazarene Coker   Coker
Pace Coker   Coker
PBAU Coker   Coker
Point Park Coker   Coker
Post Coker   Coker
Quincy Coker   Coker
Rockhurst Coker   Coker
Rollins Rollins   Rollins
RWU Coker   Coker
Seton Hill Coker   Coker
Shorter Coker   Coker
SNHU Coker   Coker
St Anselm Coker   Coker
St Leo Coker   Coker
St Michaels Coker   Coker
STAC Coker   Coker
Tampa Tampa   Tampa
Thomas More Coker   Coker
Tiffin Coker   Coker
Tusculum Coker   Coker
UAH Coker   Coker
UDC Coker   Coker
Virginia State Coker insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coker
W Jewell W Jewell   W Jewell
Walsh Coker   Coker
Wheeling Coker   Coker
Wilmington (DE) Coker   Coker
Wingate Coker   Coker
WSM Coker   Coker
Young Harris Coker   Coker

PowerWise = 74


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 0.29

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Barton          ( 1- 1, 98.7)    11-10       -1.23       6.71      -1.00         0.00             0.00
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         0.00

winning pts = 0.0000 losing points = 0.0000

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------