Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2016 girls Utah  09 23 22 22:27 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Park City ( 15 - 2 ) 1 3 1 64 . 0 %
2 American Fork ( 13 - 2 ) 2 6 2 16 . 0 %
3 Lone Peak ( 11 - 3 ) 4 14 5 7 . 0 %
4 Brighton, UT ( 11 - 2 ) 3 7 4 6 . 0 %
5 Herriman ( 11 - 3 ) 5 1 3 4 . 0 %
6 Copper Hills ( 6 - 7 ) 11 4 11 1 . 0 %
7 Lehi ( 9 - 4 ) 10 12 8 1 . 0 %
8 Riverton ( 8 - 6 ) 7 5 7 1 . 0 %
9 Alta ( 10 - 5 ) 8 10 6 0 . 10 %
10 Bingham ( 9 - 5 ) 6 16 9 0 . 10 %
11 Corner Canyon ( 3 - 10 ) 19 11 24 0 . 10 %
12 Davis, UT ( 6 - 8 ) 17 19 20 0 . 10 %
13 Jordan, UT ( 7 - 6 ) 9 9 12 0 . 10 %
14 Juan Diego CS ( 7 - 8 ) 13 2 13 0 . 10 %
15 Judge Memorial CS ( 3 - 9 ) 21 13 23 0 . 10 %
16 Mountain Crest ( 1 - 11 ) 28 25 30 0 . 10 %
17 Olympus ( 7 - 7 ) 14 8 10 0 . 10 %
18 Pleasant Grove, UT ( 7 - 7 ) 23 23 17 0 . 10 %
19 Roy ( 9 - 6 ) 15 22 15 0 . 10 %
20 Sky View ( 2 - 10 ) 26 26 27 0 . 10 %
21 Skyline, UT ( 5 - 9 ) 18 17 22 0 . 10 %
22 Timpanogos ( 2 - 10 ) 27 20 26 0 . 10 %
23 Timpview ( 6 - 6 ) 24 28 18 0 . 10 %
24 Viewmont ( 9 - 5 ) 16 29 16 0 . 10 %
25 Wasatch ( 1 - 11 ) 30 27 29 0 . 10 %
26 Waterford, UT ( 5 - 8 ) 22 21 21 0 . 10 %
27 Weber ( 5 - 8 ) 25 30 25 0 . 10 %
28 West Jordan ( 7 - 6 ) 12 18 14 0 . 10 %
29 West, UT ( 1 - 10 ) 29 24 28 0 . 10 %
30 Woods Cross ( 6 - 8 ) 20 15 19 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers