2010 girls California-North Co pr

2010 girls California-North Coast Se 09 23 22 21:30 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Monte Vista, Danville ( 23 - 0 )	1	5	1	44 . 0 %
2	Carondelet ( 17 - 6 )	2	3	3	18 . 0 %
3	Foothill, Pleasanton ( 15 - 8 )	3	1	4	17 . 0 %
4	Amador Valley ( 17 - 6 )	4	2	2	11 . 0 %
5	California HS ( 13 - 9 )	5	6	6	10 . 0 %
6	Acalanes ( 15 - 7 )	6	9	7	0 . 10 %
7	Alhambra ( 0 - 13 )	34	18	34	0 . 10 %
8	Bella Vista ( 8 - 5 )	19	25	15	0 . 10 %
9	Berkeley, CA ( 10 - 13 )	18	13	21	0 . 10 %
10	Bishop O'Dowd ( 9 - 8 )	22	29	22	0 . 10 %
11	Campolindo ( 12 - 8 )	13	19	12	0 . 10 %
12	Christian Brothers, CA ( 0 - 11 )	33	12	33	0 . 10 %
13	Clayton Valley ( 5 - 14 )	30	28	35	0 . 10 %
14	Davis ( 15 - 5 )	9	17	8	0 . 10 %
15	Dougherty Valley ( 7 - 12 )	24	27	27	0 . 10 %
16	Dublin, CA ( 3 - 13 )	29	21	31	0 . 10 %
17	Granada ( 11 - 11 )	7	7	9	0 . 10 %
18	Granite Bay HS ( 13 - 4 )	17	33	13	0 . 10 %
19	Las Lomas ( 8 - 13 )	16	20	23	0 . 10 %
20	Lick Wilmerding ( 4 - 4 )	28	35	18	0 . 10 %
21	Livermore ( 2 - 16 )	20	8	28	0 . 10 %
22	Marin Catholic, CA ( 16 - 5 )	11	24	10	0 . 10 %
23	Miramonte ( 14 - 7 )	10	16	11	0 . 10 %
24	Northgate, CA ( 3 - 7 )	31	26	24	0 . 10 %
25	Novato ( 1 - 9 )	36	30	32	0 . 10 %
26	Oak Ridge ( 11 - 10 )	15	10	16	0 . 10 %
27	Piedmont ( 4 - 9 )	26	23	26	0 . 10 %
28	Redwood ( 17 - 5 )	8	11	5	0 . 10 %
29	San Marin ( 8 - 5 )	27	36	19	0 . 10 %
30	San Ramon Valley ( 5 - 16 )	14	4	17	0 . 10 %
31	Sir Francis Drake ( 0 - 12 )	35	32	36	0 . 10 %
32	Sonoma Academy ( 4 - 10 )	25	22	29	0 . 10 %
33	St. Francis, Sac ( 10 - 5 )	12	14	14	0 . 10 %
34	Tamalpais ( 8 - 7 )	21	31	20	0 . 10 %
35	University HS, SF ( 7 - 12 )	23	15	25	0 . 10 %
36	Ursuline, CA ( 5 - 9 )	32	34	30	0 . 10 %