Region = UT Nickname = TGAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 85.2909698 Date Opponent Conference (W-L, PR) Score 322 A East UT ( 4- 6, 86.3) 2- 9 329 A Murray UT ( 6- 4, 91.2) 0- 9 407 H Waterford UT ( 4- 5, 88.8) 4-13 419 A Jordan UT (11- 0, 99.9) 1-13 421 H Bonneville UT ( 2- 8, 80.6) 7-11 426 H West UT ( 7- 4, 91.8) 0-14 427 H Bingham UT ( 9- 1, 97.9) 4-13 503 H Rocky Mountain UT ( 7- 2, 91.9) 1-12 506 A Olympus UT ( 8- 2, 93.5) 2-13 507 A Woods Cross UT ( 5- 4, 89.8) 8PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 322 A East 2- 9 -7 -12 + 3.00 329 A Murray 0- 9 -9 -17 1.00 407 H Waterford 4-13 -9 -12 1.00 419 A Jordan 1-13 -12 -26 0.00 421 H Bonneville 7-11 -4 -4 0.30 426 H West 0-14 -14 -15 0.00 427 H Bingham 4-13 -9 -21 1.00 503 H Rocky Mountain 1-12 -11 -15 0.00 506 A Olympus 2-13 -11 -19 0.00UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
/
LOCAL RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Local Power Rating....... 74.99 Local Power Rank........... 17 Local SOS Rating......... 80.21 Local SOS Rank............. 1 Local RPI Rating......... 0.42 Local RPI Rank............. 13 Championship Probability . 0.1 Championship Rank ....... 13 Local Quality Win Rating.-80.00 Local Quality Win Rank..... 17 LOCAL PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals .... 2.3 Ave Defensive Goals ...... 11.9 Wins/Losses(all )...... 0- 9 Ave Goal diff (all )..... -9.6 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 5 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... -11.4 Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 0- 7 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... -10.7 Wins/Losses(top 20)...... 0- 9 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... -9.6 Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 0- 3 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... -10.3