2018 boys WA WHSBLA pr

2018 boys WA WHSBLA 09 23 22 20:52 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Bellevue, WA ( 17 - 2 )	1	1	1	43 . 0 %
2	Mercer Island ( 16 - 7 )	2	2	3	27 . 0 %
3	Eastlake, WA ( 16 - 4 )	3	4	2	11 . 0 %
4	Skyline, WA ( 13 - 6 )	4	6	6	6 . 0 %
5	O'Dea ( 13 - 5 )	5	14	5	5 . 0 %
6	Seattle Prep ( 13 - 5 )	6	9	4	4 . 0 %
7	Tahoma ( 16 - 5 )	10	18	7	2 . 0 %
8	Skyview, WA ( 12 - 2 )	13	29	9	1 . 0 %
9	Woodinville ( 12 - 6 )	7	8	8	1 . 0 %
10	Archbishop Murphy ( 0 - 12 )	78	59	78	0 . 10 %
11	Auburn Riverside ( 8 - 9 )	41	49	53	0 . 10 %
12	Bainbridge Island ( 10 - 9 )	8	5	12	0 . 10 %
13	Ballard ( 3 - 14 )	34	10	55	0 . 10 %
14	Bellarmine Prep, WA ( 12 - 6 )	27	31	25	0 . 10 %
15	Bellingham, WA ( 7 - 9 )	46	32	48	0 . 10 %
16	Blanchet ( 12 - 4 )	48	70	28	0 . 10 %
17	Bonney Lake ( 4 - 10 )	72	69	65	0 . 10 %
18	Bothell ( 7 - 13 )	24	12	34	0 . 10 %
19	Burlington-Edison ( 13 - 1 )	29	72	13	0 . 10 %
20	Camas ( 5 - 8 )	37	21	45	0 . 10 %
21	Cascade ( 2 - 10 )	71	43	72	0 . 10 %
22	Central Kitsap ( 3 - 7 )	68	71	54	0 . 10 %
23	Central Valley ( 16 - 3 )	16	42	14	0 . 10 %
24	Chiawana ( 1 - 13 )	76	47	73	0 . 10 %
25	Columbia River ( 10 - 8 )	28	19	41	0 . 10 %
26	Curtis, WA ( 13 - 5 )	20	23	21	0 . 10 %
27	Eastside Catholic ( 8 - 8 )	9	3	10	0 . 10 %
28	Emerald Ridge ( 2 - 16 )	64	17	79	0 . 10 %
29	Ferris ( 1 - 11 )	63	35	75	0 . 10 %
30	Franklin-Garfield ( 0 - 12 )	73	55	80	0 . 10 %
31	Gig Harbor ( 9 - 7 )	32	66	46	0 . 10 %
32	Glacier Peak ( 11 - 1 )	23	62	11	0 . 10 %
33	Gonzaga Prep ( 8 - 6 )	49	45	37	0 . 10 %
34	Graham-Kapowsin ( 7 - 8 )	33	44	49	0 . 10 %
35	Hermiston ( 4 - 8 )	55	48	44	0 . 10 %
36	Issaquah ( 11 - 9 )	15	11	26	0 . 10 %
37	Jackson, WA ( 7 - 9 )	50	36	51	0 . 10 %
38	Juanita ( 9 - 8 )	12	7	16	0 . 10 %
39	Kamiak ( 3 - 13 )	52	41	81	0 . 10 %
40	Kennedy Catholic, WA ( 1 - 13 )	74	30	77	0 . 10 %
41	Klahowya ( 0 - 11 )	81	73	76	0 . 10 %
42	Lake Washington ( 15 - 5 )	17	20	18	0 . 10 %
43	Lakeside ( 6 - 10 )	14	13	32	0 . 10 %
44	Lewis & Clark ( 7 - 10 )	51	39	62	0 . 10 %
45	Liberty, WA ( 11 - 3 )	22	33	20	0 . 10 %
46	Lynden ( 2 - 7 )	61	65	56	0 . 10 %
47	Mead ( 2 - 10 )	66	52	71	0 . 10 %
48	Meadowdale ( 3 - 8 )	59	25	63	0 . 10 %
49	Monroe, WA ( 3 - 11 )	62	34	74	0 . 10 %
50	Montesano ( 1 - 7 )	80	78	58	0 . 10 %
51	Mount Si ( 5 - 12 )	35	15	47	0 . 10 %
52	Mount Spokane ( 10 - 4 )	42	53	29	0 . 10 %
53	Nathan Hale ( 6 - 11 )	56	46	66	0 . 10 %
54	Newport, WA ( 7 - 10 )	38	24	57	0 . 10 %
55	North Kitsap ( 6 - 5 )	60	79	39	0 . 10 %
56	Olympia, WA ( 5 - 11 )	67	61	69	0 . 10 %
57	Orting ( 1 - 7 )	79	80	59	0 . 10 %
58	Overlake ( 4 - 8 )	57	58	61	0 . 10 %
59	Peninsula, WA ( 8 - 3 )	31	67	27	0 . 10 %
60	Providence Classical ( 2 - 5 )	75	75	42	0 . 10 %
61	Redmond, WA ( 3 - 10 )	69	51	70	0 . 10 %
62	Richland ( 13 - 6 )	19	26	17	0 . 10 %
63	Rogers, WA ( 11 - 8 )	25	38	38	0 . 10 %
64	Roosevelt, WA ( 14 - 6 )	40	54	31	0 . 10 %
65	Sammamish-Interlake ( 3 - 7 )	45	37	52	0 . 10 %
66	Seattle Academy ( 10 - 6 )	44	56	36	0 . 10 %
67	Sehome ( 5 - 8 )	53	63	60	0 . 10 %
68	Selah ( 2 - 10 )	65	40	67	0 . 10 %
69	Sequim ( 2 - 8 )	77	74	64	0 . 10 %
70	Snohomish ( 9 - 4 )	21	27	22	0 . 10 %
71	South Kitsap ( 3 - 10 )	70	64	68	0 . 10 %
72	Southridge, WA ( 8 - 6 )	43	57	35	0 . 10 %
73	Stadium ( 7 - 3 )	58	81	30	0 . 10 %
74	Stanwood ( 13 - 6 )	26	22	24	0 . 10 %
75	Sumner ( 10 - 4 )	18	28	23	0 . 10 %
76	Union, WA ( 2 - 11 )	39	16	40	0 . 10 %
77	Vashon Island ( 11 - 2 )	47	76	19	0 . 10 %
78	Wenatchee ( 16 - 3 )	11	50	15	0 . 10 %
79	West Seattle ( 6 - 7 )	54	68	50	0 . 10 %
80	West Valley ( 10 - 7 )	36	60	43	0 . 10 %
81	White River ( 13 - 5 )	30	77	33	0 . 10 %