2016 boys Washington II pr

2016 boys Washington II 09 23 22 20:19 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Liberty ( 13 - 8 )	1	5	3	46 . 0 %
2	Union ( 16 - 4 )	2	4	1	25 . 0 %
3	White River ( 11 - 7 )	3	13	5	14 . 0 %
4	Richland ( 16 - 5 )	4	14	4	13 . 0 %
5	Central Valley ( 9 - 6 )	11	8	14	1 . 0 %
6	Klahowya ( 15 - 2 )	9	36	2	1 . 0 %
7	Archbishop Murphy ( 5 - 8 )	10	23	13	0 . 10 %
8	Auburn-Riverside ( 3 - 10 )	22	10	21	0 . 10 %
9	Bethel ( 1 - 11 )	29	15	28	0 . 10 %
10	Bonney Lake ( 7 - 9 )	13	19	12	0 . 10 %
11	Burlington-Edison ( 3 - 9 )	28	29	23	0 . 10 %
12	Camas ( 4 - 10 )	19	7	24	0 . 10 %
13	Cascade ( 6 - 8 )	23	31	19	0 . 10 %
14	Columbia River ( 7 - 5 )	7	3	8	0 . 10 %
15	Franklin ( 0 - 9 )	35	17	36	0 . 10 %
16	Friday Harbor ( 0 - 12 )	32	22	30	0 . 10 %
17	Garfield ( 1 - 10 )	33	25	34	0 . 10 %
18	Gonzaga Prep ( 14 - 3 )	8	18	6	0 . 10 %
19	Inglemoor ( 6 - 12 )	5	11	11	0 . 10 %
20	Lewis & Clark ( 4 - 9 )	21	6	25	0 . 10 %
21	Lynden ( 1 - 11 )	24	28	26	0 . 10 %
22	Mount Spokane ( 7 - 9 )	27	16	29	0 . 10 %
23	North Kitsap ( 8 - 8 )	15	24	16	0 . 10 %
24	Olympia ( 0 - 14 )	36	20	35	0 . 10 %
25	Overlake ( 8 - 8 )	16	27	15	0 . 10 %
26	Port Angeles ( 2 - 11 )	34	21	31	0 . 10 %
27	Providence Classical Chr( 4 - 9 )	26	34	32	0 . 10 %
28	Redmond ( 2 - 15 )	20	2	20	0 . 10 %
29	Sammamish-Interlake ( 2 - 14 )	17	12	18	0 . 10 %
30	Seattle Academy ( 12 - 5 )	14	30	7	0 . 10 %
31	Selah ( 0 - 13 )	30	1	33	0 . 10 %
32	Shorecrest ( 8 - 6 )	12	26	9	0 . 10 %
33	South Kitsap ( 4 - 10 )	31	32	27	0 . 10 %
34	Southridge ( 6 - 9 )	18	9	17	0 . 10 %
35	Vashon Island ( 10 - 5 )	6	35	10	0 . 10 %
36	West Seattle ( 7 - 6 )	25	33	22	0 . 10 %