2016 boys Washington I pr

2016 boys Washington I 09 23 22 20:19 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Bellevue ( 21 - 3 )	1	3	1	55 . 0 %
2	Eastside Catholic ( 17 - 3 )	2	10	2	25 . 0 %
3	Bainbridge Island ( 15 - 5 )	5	14	4	6 . 0 %
4	Mercer Island ( 15 - 6 )	3	1	5	5 . 0 %
5	Issaquah ( 18 - 5 )	4	4	3	4 . 0 %
6	Eastlake ( 14 - 7 )	7	11	9	2 . 0 %
7	Skyline ( 14 - 7 )	6	5	7	2 . 0 %
8	Woodinville ( 13 - 8 )	8	6	8	1 . 0 %
9	Ballard ( 2 - 7 )	29	27	31	0 . 10 %
10	Bellarmine Prep ( 9 - 6 )	26	37	23	0 . 10 %
11	Blanchet ( 8 - 7 )	23	23	19	0 . 10 %
12	Bothell ( 5 - 12 )	24	15	35	0 . 10 %
13	Curtis ( 10 - 8 )	22	13	25	0 . 10 %
14	Emerald Ridge ( 10 - 5 )	12	8	16	0 . 10 %
15	Gig Harbor ( 12 - 2 )	16	34	14	0 . 10 %
16	Jackson ( 12 - 5 )	25	36	26	0 . 10 %
17	Juanita ( 11 - 6 )	13	18	13	0 . 10 %
18	Kamiak ( 15 - 2 )	9	29	6	0 . 10 %
19	Kennedy Catholic ( 2 - 9 )	34	26	36	0 . 10 %
20	Lake Washington ( 9 - 8 )	15	12	15	0 . 10 %
21	Lakeside ( 8 - 6 )	19	24	21	0 . 10 %
22	Meadowdale ( 2 - 11 )	36	28	33	0 . 10 %
23	Monroe ( 6 - 8 )	31	33	28	0 . 10 %
24	Mount Si ( 3 - 12 )	33	9	29	0 . 10 %
25	Nathan Hale ( 7 - 8 )	27	25	22	0 . 10 %
26	Newport ( 1 - 14 )	30	7	34	0 . 10 %
27	O'Dea ( 8 - 6 )	11	19	10	0 . 10 %
28	Peninsula ( 9 - 6 )	21	20	24	0 . 10 %
29	Roosevelt ( 1 - 10 )	35	32	37	0 . 10 %
30	Seattle Prep ( 11 - 7 )	14	21	20	0 . 10 %
31	Sehome-Bellingham ( 12 - 6 )	17	22	11	0 . 10 %
32	Snohomish ( 7 - 6 )	32	35	30	0 . 10 %
33	Stadium ( 3 - 8 )	37	30	32	0 . 10 %
34	Stanwood ( 11 - 5 )	18	31	18	0 . 10 %
35	Sumner ( 8 - 7 )	20	16	27	0 . 10 %
36	Tahoma ( 14 - 7 )	10	17	12	0 . 10 %
37	Wenatchee ( 5 - 8 )	28	2	17	0 . 10 %