2013 boys CA Non-CIF Club pr

2013 boys CA Non-CIF Club 09 23 22 19:21 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Casa Grande ( 19 - 3 )	1	2	1	56 . 0 %
2	Petaluma ( 18 - 3 )	2	4	2	27 . 0 %
3	Elk Grove ( 15 - 3 )	4	13	3	4 . 0 %
4	Santa Monica ( 15 - 2 )	3	21	4	4 . 0 %
5	South Valley ( 9 - 3 )	5	19	7	3 . 0 %
6	Folsom United ( 12 - 5 )	8	5	5	2 . 0 %
7	Oakland Tech ( 9 - 5 )	6	16	8	2 . 0 %
8	Santa Rosa ( 7 - 4 )	7	10	11	1 . 0 %
9	Woodcreek ( 11 - 6 )	10	14	10	1 . 0 %
10	Chico ( 12 - 4 )	9	23	9	0 . 10 %
11	Damien ( 3 - 12 )	33	33	37	0 . 10 %
12	Edison ( 9 - 6 )	19	30	17	0 . 10 %
13	El Segundo ( 11 - 6 )	17	29	12	0 . 10 %
14	Glendale ( 4 - 5 )	26	32	24	0 . 10 %
15	Gold Country ( 9 - 6 )	11	15	14	0 . 10 %
16	Granada Hills ( 6 - 8 )	20	22	26	0 . 10 %
17	La Mirada ( 3 - 11 )	31	27	31	0 . 10 %
18	La Quinta-Desert Vly ( 9 - 6 )	24	34	19	0 . 10 %
19	Morgan Hill ( 0 - 11 )	36	9	28	0 . 10 %
20	Murrieta ( 2 - 8 )	37	36	33	0 . 10 %
21	Napa ( 1 - 14 )	22	1	27	0 . 10 %
22	Norco ( 6 - 12 )	30	35	35	0 . 10 %
23	Oceanside United ( 14 - 4 )	13	24	6	0 . 10 %
24	Orangevale ( 9 - 7 )	12	12	13	0 . 10 %
25	Pasadena ( 5 - 5 )	27	31	20	0 . 10 %
26	Pleasant Grove ( 7 - 7 )	16	7	15	0 . 10 %
27	Rancho Cotati ( 3 - 9 )	14	3	18	0 . 10 %
28	Red Bluff ( 4 - 7 )	23	20	21	0 . 10 %
29	Rio City ( 2 - 12 )	28	8	30	0 . 10 %
30	Saint John Bosco ( 2 - 10 )	34	28	32	0 . 10 %
31	San Jose ( 3 - 9 )	15	11	25	0 . 10 %
32	Santa Clarita Valley LC ( 9 - 4 )	18	26	16	0 . 10 %
33	Sierra Foothills ( 0 - 15 )	29	6	36	0 . 10 %
34	Skyline ( 2 - 6 )	32	25	22	0 . 10 %
35	Stockton ( 4 - 8 )	21	17	23	0 . 10 %
36	Valley Christian ( 5 - 10 )	35	37	34	0 . 10 %
37	Yuba City ( 5 - 12 )	25	18	29	0 . 10 %