Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2012 boys Massachusetts MIAA Central 10 02 22 32:09 PDT


Switch to Power Rating Method
Rating Percentage Index (RPI)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Tournament Selection
Explanation
Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team RPI SOS QWF Selection Sum
1 Longmeadow ( 17 - 5 ) 1 2 1 4
2 Concord Carlisle ( 22 - 0 ) 2 1 2 5
3 South Hadley ( 15 - 6 ) 2 4 2 8
4 Tyngsborough ( 21 - 1 ) 4 3 2 9
5 Algonquin ( 22 - 2 ) 1 9 1 11
6 Minnechaug ( 14 - 8 ) 3 5 3 11
7 Oakmont Regional ( 16 - 4 ) 5 5 4 14
8 Amherst-Pelham ( 13 - 7 ) 5 6 7 18
9 Shrewsbury ( 11 - 9 ) 7 6 6 19
10 St Johns Shrewsbury ( 16 - 5 ) 3 11 5 19
11 Littleton ( 10 - 7 ) 10 8 8 26
12 Grafton ( 21 - 3 ) 2 24 3 29
13 Westborough ( 11 - 9 ) 6 16 7 29
14 Cathedral Springfield ( 11 - 11 ) 11 9 9 29
15 West Springfield ( 7 - 12 ) 10 8 11 29
16 Milford ( 10 - 10 ) 8 15 9 32
17 Nashoba Regional ( 10 - 9 ) 11 13 10 34
18 Tantasqua Regional ( 10 - 9 ) 12 10 13 35
19 Wachusett ( 5 - 13 ) 16 2 17 35
20 Agawam ( 9 - 10 ) 13 10 14 37
21 Groton-Dunstable ( 8 - 10 ) 9 18 11 38
22 Hudson ( 11 - 10 ) 13 17 12 42
23 North Middlesex ( 0 - 18 ) 18 1 23 42
24 Marlborough ( 3 - 15 ) 17 4 22 43
25 Leominster ( 7 - 13 ) 19 7 18 44

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers