2012 boys Utah ULA pr

2012 boys Utah ULA 09 23 22 19:18 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Alta ( 19 - 2 )	1	2	1	39 . 0 %
2	Juan Diego Catholic ( 17 - 2 )	2	12	2	22 . 0 %
3	Brighton ( 14 - 5 )	3	1	3	21 . 0 %
4	Judge Memorial ( 13 - 3 )	4	6	4	9 . 0 %
5	Bingham ( 13 - 6 )	5	3	5	5 . 0 %
6	Bountiful ( 11 - 7 )	8	5	7	2 . 0 %
7	Pleasant Grove ( 11 - 4 )	9	19	8	1 . 0 %
8	Timpanogos ( 11 - 4 )	7	11	6	1 . 0 %
9	American Fork ( 3 - 10 )	25	14	27	0 . 10 %
10	Bonneville ( 1 - 12 )	23	9	30	0 . 10 %
11	Box Elder ( 10 - 4 )	17	37	17	0 . 10 %
12	Copper Hills ( 8 - 10 )	13	4	11	0 . 10 %
13	Davis ( 7 - 7 )	12	15	16	0 . 10 %
14	East ( 4 - 10 )	32	27	32	0 . 10 %
15	Fremont ( 3 - 10 )	33	29	36	0 . 10 %
16	Herriman ( 10 - 6 )	19	28	20	0 . 10 %
17	Highland ( 2 - 10 )	37	33	34	0 . 10 %
18	Idaho Falls ( 0 - 11 )	38	30	39	0 . 10 %
19	Jordan ( 6 - 9 )	14	13	18	0 . 10 %
20	Lehi ( 10 - 9 )	22	31	28	0 . 10 %
21	Logan ( 6 - 7 )	27	25	25	0 . 10 %
22	Lone Peak ( 8 - 6 )	11	17	12	0 . 10 %
23	Mountain Crest ( 15 - 1 )	16	32	9	0 . 10 %
24	Murray ( 1 - 13 )	39	35	40	0 . 10 %
25	Northridge ( 4 - 11 )	29	24	37	0 . 10 %
26	Olympus ( 6 - 8 )	10	8	14	0 . 10 %
27	Orem ( 5 - 9 )	30	26	29	0 . 10 %
28	Park City ( 8 - 7 )	6	10	10	0 . 10 %
29	Riverton ( 6 - 9 )	24	18	23	0 . 10 %
30	Sky View ( 7 - 6 )	31	36	24	0 . 10 %
31	Skyline ( 2 - 11 )	28	7	26	0 . 10 %
32	Spanish Fork ( 9 - 6 )	18	22	19	0 . 10 %
33	Syracuse ( 11 - 7 )	26	34	21	0 . 10 %
34	Timpview ( 0 - 10 )	40	21	35	0 . 10 %
35	Viewmont ( 9 - 6 )	15	20	13	0 . 10 %
36	Waterford ( 12 - 6 )	21	23	15	0 . 10 %
37	Weber ( 5 - 8 )	20	16	22	0 . 10 %
38	West ( 6 - 9 )	35	40	33	0 . 10 %
39	West Jordan ( 7 - 9 )	34	38	31	0 . 10 %
40	Woods Cross ( 2 - 10 )	36	39	38	0 . 10 %