2012 boys CA Non-CIF Club pr

2012 boys CA Non-CIF Club 09 23 22 19:08 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings (PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	South Valley ( 19 - 0 )	1	10	1	39 . 0 %
2	Pleasant Grove ( 16 - 1 )	2	21	2	27 . 0 %
3	Petaluma ( 14 - 7 )	4	4	3	11 . 0 %
4	Casa Grande ( 13 - 4 )	3	8	5	8 . 0 %
5	Rancho Cotati ( 11 - 5 )	5	5	6	7 . 0 %
6	Oceanside United ( 14 - 1 )	8	26	4	4 . 0 %
7	Santa Rosa ( 5 - 9 )	6	2	10	3 . 0 %
8	Santa Monica ( 12 - 4 )	7	27	9	1 . 0 %
9	Chico ( 5 - 8 )	19	28	27	0 . 10 %
10	Desert Valley ( 0 - 9 )	36	16	35	0 . 10 %
11	Edison ( 5 - 5 )	24	33	22	0 . 10 %
12	El Segundo ( 0 - 10 )	33	17	36	0 . 10 %
13	Elk Grove ( 13 - 4 )	9	14	7	0 . 10 %
14	Folsom United ( 6 - 6 )	12	19	18	0 . 10 %
15	Glendale ( 0 - 12 )	34	25	37	0 . 10 %
16	Gold Country ( 4 - 8 )	21	23	25	0 . 10 %
17	Granada Hills ( 4 - 7 )	28	35	28	0 . 10 %
18	Hart ( 3 - 8 )	25	32	32	0 . 10 %
19	Long Beach ( 6 - 6 )	29	34	23	0 . 10 %
20	Morgan Hill ( 0 - 8 )	37	12	31	0 . 10 %
21	Napa ( 0 - 11 )	20	1	24	0 . 10 %
22	Oakland Tech ( 11 - 6 )	10	30	12	0 . 10 %
23	Orangevale ( 5 - 8 )	16	7	17	0 . 10 %
24	Pasadena ( 2 - 4 )	32	20	21	0 . 10 %
25	Redding ( 10 - 4 )	14	22	13	0 . 10 %
26	Rio City ( 1 - 11 )	30	11	34	0 . 10 %
27	Saint John Bosco ( 8 - 6 )	26	37	19	0 . 10 %
28	San Francisco LC ( 7 - 5 )	22	31	14	0 . 10 %
29	San Jose ( 6 - 8 )	18	15	16	0 . 10 %
30	Santa Clarita ( 5 - 5 )	17	24	20	0 . 10 %
31	Simi Valley ( 11 - 1 )	15	36	8	0 . 10 %
32	Skyline ( 1 - 11 )	35	13	33	0 . 10 %
33	Stockton ( 1 - 9 )	27	6	30	0 . 10 %
34	Torrance ( 11 - 5 )	13	29	15	0 . 10 %
35	Washington ( 2 - 10 )	31	9	29	0 . 10 %
36	Woodcreek ( 7 - 5 )	11	3	11	0 . 10 %
37	Yuba City ( 4 - 8 )	23	18	26	0 . 10 %