Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2011 boys Washington II  09 23 22 19:06 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Providence Classical Chr( 13 - 3 ) 2 6 5 33 . 0 %
2 Woodinville ( 18 - 0 ) 1 5 1 30 . 0 %
3 Sammamish ( 19 - 1 ) 4 21 4 14 . 0 %
4 Wenatchee ( 15 - 3 ) 3 14 3 10 . 0 %
5 Garfield ( 14 - 3 ) 5 11 2 7 . 0 %
6 Snohomish ( 8 - 5 ) 6 3 7 5 . 0 %
7 Skagit Valley ( 9 - 9 ) 11 8 12 1 . 0 %
8 Ballard ( 6 - 11 ) 12 18 18 0 . 10 %
9 Blanchet ( 12 - 5 ) 9 16 6 0 . 10 %
10 Everett ( 2 - 11 ) 20 1 22 0 . 10 %
11 Franklin ( 0 - 13 ) 28 7 25 0 . 10 %
12 Gig Harbor ( 7 - 7 ) 22 25 17 0 . 10 %
13 Highline ( 12 - 7 ) 15 23 10 0 . 10 %
14 Klahowya ( 11 - 4 ) 10 26 9 0 . 10 %
15 Liberty ( 6 - 8 ) 21 20 19 0 . 10 %
16 Mount Si ( 2 - 16 ) 26 19 27 0 . 10 %
17 Nathan Hale ( 8 - 9 ) 16 15 13 0 . 10 %
18 North County ( 9 - 8 ) 14 10 11 0 . 10 %
19 North Kitsap ( 5 - 10 ) 25 27 23 0 . 10 %
20 Port Angeles ( 4 - 11 ) 24 28 26 0 . 10 %
21 Redmond ( 8 - 6 ) 19 22 15 0 . 10 %
22 Roosevelt ( 6 - 11 ) 13 13 20 0 . 10 %
23 San Juan ( 0 - 11 ) 23 4 24 0 . 10 %
24 Selah ( 5 - 11 ) 18 17 21 0 . 10 %
25 South Kitsap ( 0 - 13 ) 27 24 28 0 . 10 %
26 Stanwood ( 5 - 7 ) 8 2 14 0 . 10 %
27 Three Rivers ( 10 - 7 ) 7 12 8 0 . 10 %
28 Whatcom ( 5 - 8 ) 17 9 16 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers