2010 boys New York - Section V pr

2010 boys New York - Section V 09 23 22 18:51 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Fairport ( 19 - 3 )	1	2	1	59 . 0 %
2	Canandaigua ( 16 - 2 )	2	8	2	24 . 0 %
3	Pittsford ( 15 - 4 )	3	5	3	8 . 0 %
4	Webster Thomas ( 15 - 4 )	4	7	4	4 . 0 %
5	Aquinas Institute ( 17 - 4 )	6	10	6	2 . 0 %
6	Irondequoit ( 13 - 8 )	5	1	5	2 . 0 %
7	Webster Schroeder ( 6 - 11 )	8	3	18	1 . 0 %
8	Batavia ( 8 - 9 )	28	28	27	0 . 10 %
9	Bath-Haverling ( 9 - 9 )	18	19	19	0 . 10 %
10	Bishop Kearney ( 0 - 14 )	35	20	29	0 . 10 %
11	Bloomfield-Honeoye ( 15 - 4 )	23	34	13	0 . 10 %
12	Brighton ( 16 - 2 )	16	25	7	0 . 10 %
13	Brockport Central ( 0 - 17 )	22	13	28	0 . 10 %
14	Churchville-Chili ( 6 - 12 )	15	12	20	0 . 10 %
15	East Rochester ( 9 - 8 )	27	31	24	0 . 10 %
16	Eastridge ( 2 - 15 )	31	23	34	0 . 10 %
17	Gates-Chili ( 3 - 14 )	21	11	25	0 . 10 %
18	Geneva ( 15 - 4 )	17	30	11	0 . 10 %
19	Greece Arcadia/Olympia ( 3 - 14 )	32	29	32	0 . 10 %
20	Greece Odyssey/Athena ( 10 - 7 )	25	35	22	0 . 10 %
21	Hilton ( 4 - 14 )	20	14	26	0 . 10 %
22	Honeoye Falls-Lima ( 10 - 8 )	12	16	12	0 . 10 %
23	Livonia ( 10 - 8 )	13	18	15	0 . 10 %
24	Marcus Whitman ( 2 - 15 )	33	21	33	0 . 10 %
25	McQuaid Jesuit ( 12 - 5 )	10	17	8	0 . 10 %
26	Midlakes ( 13 - 5 )	19	33	17	0 . 10 %
27	Mynderse Academy ( 5 - 12 )	29	27	30	0 . 10 %
28	Newark ( 2 - 15 )	34	26	35	0 . 10 %
29	Palmyra-Macedon ( 12 - 6 )	24	32	21	0 . 10 %
30	Penfield ( 11 - 7 )	11	9	9	0 . 10 %
31	Penn Yan ( 11 - 9 )	7	4	10	0 . 10 %
32	Rush-Henrietta ( 9 - 9 )	9	6	14	0 . 10 %
33	Spencerport ( 9 - 9 )	26	24	23	0 . 10 %
34	Victor ( 8 - 9 )	14	15	16	0 . 10 %
35	Waterloo ( 4 - 13 )	30	22	31	0 . 10 %