Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2010 boys Nevada  09 23 22 18:50 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Palo Verde ( 20 - 2 ) 1 3 1 64 . 0 %
2 Henderson ( 12 - 3 ) 3 6 3 17 . 0 %
3 Centennial ( 14 - 4 ) 2 4 2 15 . 0 %
4 Faith Lutheran ( 6 - 9 ) 4 5 11 4 . 0 %
5 Arbor View ( 6 - 9 ) 18 14 15 0 . 10 %
6 Bishop Gorman ( 12 - 3 ) 11 18 5 0 . 10 %
7 Bishop Manogue ( 7 - 4 ) 9 12 8 0 . 10 %
8 Bonanza ( 8 - 9 ) 7 2 7 0 . 10 %
9 Faith Lutheran II ( 5 - 10 ) 15 16 16 0 . 10 %
10 Galena ( 8 - 6 ) 6 11 6 0 . 10 %
11 Green Valley ( 11 - 5 ) 10 20 9 0 . 10 %
12 Henderson II ( 1 - 13 ) 20 15 20 0 . 10 %
13 High Sierra-Reno ( 10 - 3 ) 5 7 4 0 . 10 %
14 Legacy ( 6 - 9 ) 8 1 10 0 . 10 %
15 Palo Verde II ( 5 - 8 ) 17 19 14 0 . 10 %
16 Red Rock ( 4 - 10 ) 16 17 17 0 . 10 %
17 Spanish Springs ( 4 - 6 ) 12 8 12 0 . 10 %
18 Spring Valley ( 2 - 12 ) 19 13 19 0 . 10 %
19 Truckee-Tahoe ( 2 - 7 ) 13 9 13 0 . 10 %
20 Wooster ( 0 - 9 ) 14 10 18 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers