Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2010 boys CA Non-CIF Club  09 23 22 18:44 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Casa Grande ( 20 - 2 ) 1 3 1 71 . 0 %
2 Santa Rosa ( 12 - 4 ) 2 2 2 21 . 0 %
3 Simi Valley ( 9 - 2 ) 4 14 9 4 . 0 %
4 Chico ( 11 - 4 ) 5 12 5 1 . 0 %
5 Gold Country ( 10 - 4 ) 3 9 4 1 . 0 %
6 Orangevale ( 9 - 4 ) 7 18 8 1 . 0 %
7 Petaluma ( 3 - 9 ) 10 1 19 1 . 0 %
8 Desert Valley/La Quinta ( 3 - 11 ) 26 25 28 0 . 10 %
9 Edison ( 7 - 5 ) 18 22 17 0 . 10 %
10 El Camino ( 10 - 4 ) 16 24 12 0 . 10 %
11 El Segundo ( 14 - 5 ) 11 21 7 0 . 10 %
12 Folsom United ( 7 - 8 ) 14 16 16 0 . 10 %
13 Glendale ( 7 - 7 ) 23 29 23 0 . 10 %
14 Granada Hills ( 0 - 13 ) 31 26 31 0 . 10 %
15 Long Beach ( 1 - 12 ) 29 23 30 0 . 10 %
16 Morgan Hill ( 3 - 11 ) 22 11 26 0 . 10 %
17 Napa ( 6 - 7 ) 12 4 11 0 . 10 %
18 Pasadena ( 6 - 6 ) 24 27 20 0 . 10 %
19 Pleasant Grove ( 3 - 10 ) 21 6 22 0 . 10 %
20 Rancho Cotati ( 9 - 6 ) 8 7 10 0 . 10 %
21 Redding ( 5 - 9 ) 15 17 21 0 . 10 %
22 San Francisco City ( 12 - 3 ) 9 15 3 0 . 10 %
23 San Jose ( 8 - 6 ) 17 20 13 0 . 10 %
24 Saugus ( 3 - 6 ) 28 31 25 0 . 10 %
25 Sierra Foothills ( 0 - 13 ) 30 8 27 0 . 10 %
26 Skyline ( 1 - 7 ) 25 10 24 0 . 10 %
27 South Valley ( 10 - 4 ) 6 13 6 0 . 10 %
28 Stockton ( 1 - 12 ) 27 19 29 0 . 10 %
29 Torrance ( 8 - 4 ) 19 28 14 0 . 10 %
30 Valencia ( 9 - 4 ) 13 30 15 0 . 10 %
31 Yuba City ( 4 - 7 ) 20 5 18 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers