![]()
2009 boys South Carolina Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Bishop England 1 90.28 0 1 | 1 Bluffton 1 0.67 8 8 2 Bluffton 2 88.74 8 8 | 2 Bishop England 2 0.66 0 1 3 Greenville 3 87.31 14 2 | 3 Woodmont 3 0.65 7 9 4 Woodmont 4 86.66 7 9 | 4 Camden Mil Aca 4 0.63 5 10 5 Riverside 5 86.60 15 2 | 5 Greenville 5 0.63 14 2 6 Spartanburg HS 6 86.36 2 9 | 6 Hillcrest 6 0.62 9 4 7 Charleston LC 7 86.15 1 7 | 7 Wando 7 0.61 14 1 8 Camden Mil Aca 8 86.13 5 10 | 8 Blythewood 8 0.59 4 8 9 Wando 9 85.76 14 1 | 9 J.L. Mann Acad 9 0.59 9 4 10 Hilton Head HS 10 85.74 8 5 | 10 Hilton Head HS 10 0.58 8 5 11 Hillcrest 11 85.58 9 4 | 11 Mauldin 11 0.58 7 6 12 Blythewood 12 85.50 4 8 | 12 Spartanburg HS 12 0.55 2 9 13 Heathwood Hall 13 85.39 7 6 | 13 Socastee 13 0.53 10 4 14 Wade Hampton 14 85.33 0 13 | 14 Heathwood Hall 14 0.53 7 6 15 A.C. Flora 15 85.08 6 8 | 15 Savannah LC 15 0.52 4 6 16 Savannah LC 16 85.03 4 6 | 16 A.C. Flora 16 0.52 6 8 17 J.L. Mann Acad 17 84.92 9 4 | 17 Wade Hampton 17 0.52 0 13 18 Socastee 18 84.73 10 4 | 18 Charleston LC 18 0.51 1 7 19 Mauldin 19 84.54 7 6 | 19 Riverside 19 0.48 15 2 20 Dorman 20 84.45 1 8 | 20 Eastside 20 0.46 5 6 21 Eastside 21 83.40 5 6 | 21 Hammond School 21 0.45 6 5 22 Ridge View 22 82.18 1 9 | 22 Dorman 22 0.45 1 8 23 White Knoll 23 82.04 3 8 | 23 Ridge View 23 0.43 1 9 24 Spartanburg Da 24 81.20 4 5 | 24 White Knoll 24 0.41 3 8 25 Hammond School 25 81.15 6 5 | 25 Fort Mill 25 0.41 9 3 26 Fort Mill 26 79.25 9 3 | 26 Spartanburg Da 26 0.35 4 5 27 Columbia LC 27 79.15 0 5 | 27 Columbia LC 27 0.30 0 5 28 Lake Murray LC 28 76.53 3 6 | 28 Lake Murray LC 28 0.30 3 6