Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2009 boys North Carolina Public  09 23 22 18:40 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Charlotte Providence ( 22 - 1 ) 1 1 1 50 . 0 %
2 Chapel Hill ( 18 - 2 ) 2 3 2 26 . 0 %
3 Charlotte Catholic ( 18 - 4 ) 3 5 4 9 . 0 %
4 Wakefield ( 19 - 1 ) 4 42 3 4 . 0 %
5 Greensboro Page ( 10 - 5 ) 5 2 8 3 . 0 %
6 Ardrey Kell ( 11 - 7 ) 15 25 16 2 . 0 %
7 Cardinal Gibbons ( 18 - 4 ) 6 24 5 2 . 0 %
8 Charlotte Myers Park ( 11 - 8 ) 11 11 11 1 . 0 %
9 Holly Springs ( 14 - 3 ) 10 38 6 1 . 0 %
10 NorthWest Guilford ( 12 - 6 ) 12 16 12 1 . 0 %
11 Wilmington Hoggard ( 14 - 7 ) 7 6 9 1 . 0 %
12 Apex ( 11 - 6 ) 20 20 19 0 . 10 %
13 Athens Drive ( 9 - 10 ) 35 49 49 0 . 10 %
14 Bishop McGuinness ( 12 - 4 ) 29 37 18 0 . 10 %
15 Broughton-Needham ( 10 - 4 ) 24 46 14 0 . 10 %
16 Carrboro ( 9 - 6 ) 23 35 24 0 . 10 %
17 Cary HS ( 6 - 9 ) 33 29 42 0 . 10 %
18 Cary-Middle Creek ( 6 - 12 ) 32 23 44 0 . 10 %
19 Cedar Ridge ( 8 - 10 ) 28 31 33 0 . 10 %
20 Charlotte Butler ( 4 - 13 ) 38 22 43 0 . 10 %
21 Charlotte North Meck ( 8 - 11 ) 31 39 36 0 . 10 %
22 Charlotte South Meck ( 1 - 15 ) 53 28 54 0 . 10 %
23 Durham Jordan ( 9 - 8 ) 14 21 22 0 . 10 %
24 Durham Riverside ( 5 - 10 ) 21 9 28 0 . 10 %
25 Durham School-Arts ( 2 - 4 ) 50 58 32 0 . 10 %
26 East Chapel Hill ( 14 - 5 ) 8 14 7 0 . 10 %
27 Eastern Guilford ( 3 - 14 ) 55 52 56 0 . 10 %
28 Freedom-Morganton ( 0 - 6 ) 58 30 35 0 . 10 %
29 Garner ( 2 - 11 ) 46 34 48 0 . 10 %
30 Green Hope ( 9 - 5 ) 25 43 26 0 . 10 %
31 Greensboro Grimsley ( 10 - 7 ) 13 17 17 0 . 10 %
32 Hickory ( 6 - 5 ) 27 45 20 0 . 10 %
33 Hillsborough Orange ( 2 - 11 ) 52 50 52 0 . 10 %
34 Hopewell ( 1 - 15 ) 48 8 47 0 . 10 %
35 Mallard Creek ( 0 - 3 ) 57 56 31 0 . 10 %
36 Marvin Ridge ( 7 - 9 ) 22 27 29 0 . 10 %
37 Millbrook ( 4 - 11 ) 43 41 45 0 . 10 %
38 Mount Tabor ( 11 - 9 ) 16 10 15 0 . 10 %
39 NorthEast Guilford ( 2 - 13 ) 56 57 58 0 . 10 %
40 Northern Durham ( 1 - 12 ) 47 15 46 0 . 10 %
41 Northern Guilford ( 7 - 8 ) 49 54 41 0 . 10 %
42 Panther Creek ( 4 - 13 ) 37 26 51 0 . 10 %
43 Patton-Morganton ( 6 - 5 ) 51 55 27 0 . 10 %
44 R.J. Reynolds ( 13 - 6 ) 17 18 10 0 . 10 %
45 Ragsdale-Jamestown ( 3 - 12 ) 40 33 53 0 . 10 %
46 Reagan ( 8 - 6 ) 36 40 34 0 . 10 %
47 SouthEast Guilford ( 2 - 11 ) 45 48 55 0 . 10 %
48 SouthEast Raleigh ( 0 - 15 ) 54 32 57 0 . 10 %
49 SouthWest Guilford ( 9 - 7 ) 39 53 37 0 . 10 %
50 Triton ( 8 - 9 ) 44 51 38 0 . 10 %
51 W.G. Enloe ( 5 - 10 ) 42 36 39 0 . 10 %
52 Weddington ( 9 - 10 ) 18 12 21 0 . 10 %
53 West Forsyth ( 3 - 13 ) 41 19 50 0 . 10 %
54 Western Alamance ( 11 - 6 ) 26 47 25 0 . 10 %
55 Western Guilford ( 12 - 6 ) 19 44 23 0 . 10 %
56 Wilmington Ashley ( 7 - 9 ) 34 13 30 0 . 10 %
57 Wilmington Laney ( 12 - 4 ) 9 7 13 0 . 10 %
58 Wilmington New Hanover ( 4 - 13 ) 30 4 40 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers