Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

2009 boys CA Club  09 23 22 18:33 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings (PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Casa Grande ( 18 - 4 ) 1 9 2 41 . 0 %
2 Newbury Park ( 17 - 3 ) 2 5 1 29 . 0 %
3 Petaluma ( 18 - 3 ) 3 12 3 11 . 0 %
4 Palo Alto (THLC) ( 12 - 5 ) 5 13 6 6 . 0 %
5 Thousand Oaks ( 13 - 6 ) 4 6 4 4 . 0 %
6 Westlake ( 7 - 9 ) 8 8 15 4 . 0 %
7 Cordova-Folsom ( 12 - 4 ) 6 18 8 3 . 0 %
8 Agoura ( 10 - 5 ) 7 10 5 2 . 0 %
9 Calabasas ( 0 - 15 ) 28 3 32 0 . 10 %
10 Chatsworth ( 3 - 6 ) 27 36 29 0 . 10 %
11 Chico ( 8 - 3 ) 9 7 7 0 . 10 %
12 Edison ( 8 - 5 ) 15 29 17 0 . 10 %
13 El Segundo ( 5 - 5 ) 23 26 18 0 . 10 %
14 Glendale ( 9 - 5 ) 25 35 19 0 . 10 %
15 Gold Country ( 10 - 9 ) 13 15 11 0 . 10 %
16 La Quinta ( 8 - 3 ) 17 34 16 0 . 10 %
17 Long Beach ( 1 - 9 ) 33 25 33 0 . 10 %
18 Mendocino ( 0 - 7 ) 34 2 23 0 . 10 %
19 Monterey ( 7 - 6 ) 14 33 21 0 . 10 %
20 Morgan Hill ( 5 - 8 ) 24 27 25 0 . 10 %
21 Napa ( 7 - 10 ) 19 20 22 0 . 10 %
22 Orangevale ( 10 - 4 ) 12 19 9 0 . 10 %
23 Pasadena ( 9 - 3 ) 16 28 10 0 . 10 %
24 Pleasant Grove ( 6 - 9 ) 20 22 26 0 . 10 %
25 Rancho Cotati ( 8 - 8 ) 11 11 12 0 . 10 %
26 Redding ( 4 - 7 ) 22 32 27 0 . 10 %
27 San Francisco City ( 5 - 8 ) 21 14 20 0 . 10 %
28 Santa Rosa ( 8 - 7 ) 10 17 13 0 . 10 %
29 Saugus ( 5 - 7 ) 26 23 28 0 . 10 %
30 Sierra Foothills ( 0 - 11 ) 36 16 34 0 . 10 %
31 Skyline ( 4 - 6 ) 32 30 24 0 . 10 %
32 South Valley ( 0 - 1 ) 18 1 14 0 . 10 %
33 Stockton ( 0 - 12 ) 35 21 36 0 . 10 %
34 Torrance ( 2 - 7 ) 29 31 30 0 . 10 %
35 Ukiah ( 0 - 10 ) 30 4 31 0 . 10 %
36 Valencia ( 0 - 9 ) 31 24 35 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers