Region = WA 2 Evergrn Nickname = A Quakers Coach = Loy KalepoGAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 89.2793274 Date Opponent Conference (W-L, PR) Score 316 A Nathan Hale WA 2 Evergrn (13- 3, 93.0) 9-12 320 A Overlake WA 2 Evergrn (10- 6, 89.2) 6- 9 322 A Lake Tapps WA 2 Evergrn (10- 5, 87.9) 7- 8 o 328 H Blanchet WA 2 Evergrn ( 7- 7, 85.9) 9- 6 330 H Mt Ranier WA 2 Evergrn ( 1-13, 71.8) 9- 6 404 H Sammamish WA 2 Evergrn ( 1-13, 70.9) 11- 0 407 H Whatcom WA 2 Skagit ( 5- 9, 81.3) 9-14 417 A Puyallup WA 2 Olympic (14- 5, 95.4) 1-16 421 H Overlake WA 2 Evergrn (10- 6, 89.2) 8- 9 o 423 A Mt Ranier WA 2 Evergrn ( 1-13, 71.8) 16- 1 427 A Sammamish WA 2 Evergrn ( 1-13, 70.9) 14- 3 501 H Nathan Hale WA 2 Evergrn (13- 3, 93.0) 6- 9 504 H Lake Tapps WA 2 Evergrn (10- 5, 87.9) 14- 7 508 A Blanchet WA 2 Evergrn ( 7- 7, 85.9) 7- 8PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 316 A Nathan Hale 9-12 -3 -8 ++ 5.78 320 A Overlake 6- 9 -3 -4 1.96 322 A Lake Tapps 7- 8 o -1 -3 + 2.63 328 H Blanchet 9- 6 3 0 + 3.58 330 H Mt Ranier 9- 6 3 13 --- -7.00 404 H Sammamish 11- 0 11 14 0.00 407 H Whatcom 9-14 -5 4 --- -9.03 417 A Puyallup 1-16 -15 -11 0.00 421 H Overlake 8- 9 o -1 -3 + 2.88 423 A Mt Ranier 16- 1 15 12 0.00 427 A Sammamish 14- 3 11 13 0.00 501 H Nathan Hale 6- 9 -3 -7 ++ 4.70 504 H Lake Tapps 14- 7 7 -2 +++ 9.55 508 A Blanchet 7- 8 -1 -1 0.65UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
/
LOCAL RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Local Power Rating....... 84.79 Local Power Rank........... 12 Local SOS Rating......... 65.68 Local SOS Rank............. 15 Local RPI Rating......... 0.46 Local RPI Rank............. 14 Championship Probability . 0.1 Championship Rank ....... 8 Local Quality Win Rating. 10.00 Local Quality Win Rank..... 12 LOCAL PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals .... 9.0 Ave Defensive Goals ...... 7.7 Wins/Losses(all )...... 6- 8 Ave Goal diff (all )..... 1.3 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 3 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... -7.0 Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 2- 7 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... -1.9 Wins/Losses(top 20)...... 6- 8 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... 1.3 Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 1- 2 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... 1.0