2006 boys PA Central pr

2006 boys PA Central 09 23 22 18:13 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Manheim Township ( 23 - 5 )	1	2	1	55 . 0 %
2	Hempfield ( 15 - 10 )	2	1	3	22 . 0 %
3	Carlisle ( 10 - 9 )	3	3	5	15 . 0 %
4	Cumberland Valley ( 15 - 6 )	4	4	2	6 . 0 %
5	Lancaster Country Day ( 14 - 7 )	5	6	4	2 . 0 %
6	Bishop McDevitt ( 7 - 11 )	22	20	26	0 . 10 %
7	Chambersburg ( 0 - 8 )	27	22	31	0 . 10 %
8	Central Dauphin ( 8 - 6 )	11	14	15	0 . 10 %
9	Columbia-Montour ( 1 - 5 )	32	34	24	0 . 10 %
10	Cocalico ( 1 - 10 )	26	9	23	0 . 10 %
11	Central Susquehanna ( 6 - 10 )	20	23	29	0 . 10 %
12	Conestoga Valley ( 9 - 10 )	10	8	13	0 . 10 %
13	Dallastown ( 6 - 6 )	19	26	19	0 . 10 %
14	Central Dauphin East ( 8 - 5 )	17	16	16	0 . 10 %
15	Ephrata ( 13 - 6 )	9	13	6	0 . 10 %
16	Harrisburg Academy ( 3 - 13 )	23	19	35	0 . 10 %
17	Hershey ( 13 - 8 )	12	10	7	0 . 10 %
18	Kennard-Dale ( 0 - 6 )	33	24	25	0 . 10 %
19	Elizabethtown ( 0 - 12 )	25	5	32	0 . 10 %
20	Lampeter-Strasburg ( 11 - 7 )	13	17	11	0 . 10 %
21	Lewisburg ( 7 - 4 )	24	35	20	0 . 10 %
22	Lower Dauphin ( 9 - 8 )	14	11	14	0 . 10 %
23	Midd-West ( 0 - 1 )	35	28	17	0 . 10 %
24	Northern York ( 5 - 10 )	28	30	34	0 . 10 %
25	Penn Manor ( 3 - 10 )	16	7	21	0 . 10 %
26	Palmyra ( 4 - 11 )	18	21	33	0 . 10 %
27	Red Lion ( 11 - 8 )	7	15	8	0 . 10 %
28	Selinsgrove ( 0 - 6 )	34	29	30	0 . 10 %
29	State College ( 14 - 9 )	21	32	18	0 . 10 %
30	Susquehannock ( 12 - 3 )	6	31	10	0 . 10 %
31	South-Western ( 10 - 5 )	15	25	12	0 . 10 %
32	Warwick ( 13 - 8 )	8	12	9	0 . 10 %
33	Central York ( 1 - 8 )	30	18	27	0 . 10 %
34	York Suburban ( 4 - 9 )	29	27	28	0 . 10 %
35	York Catholic ( 2 - 5 )	31	33	22	0 . 10 %