boys 2004 Vermont II Strength of Schedule ARC
Based on Power Ratings Based on RPIRank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Oakton 1 92.10 16 2 | 1 West Springfie 1 0.69 10 5 2 Westfield 2 91.74 7 9 | 2 Robinson 2 0.66 12 4 3 Robinson 3 91.14 12 4 | 3 Madison 3 0.63 10 7 4 Lake Braddock 4 89.79 9 7 | 4 Oakton 4 0.62 16 2 5 Centreville 5 89.39 1 11 | 5 Chantilly 5 0.61 4 10 6 Woodson 6 88.94 13 5 | 6 Westfield 6 0.60 7 9 7 Annandale 7 88.69 6 8 | 7 Lake Braddock 7 0.57 9 7 8 Chantilly 8 88.56 4 10 | 8 Centreville 8 0.57 1 11 9 Thos Jefferson 9 87.66 11 5 | 9 Thos Jefferson 9 0.55 11 5 10 Langley 10 87.29 10 6 | 10 Hayfield 10 0.55 4 8 11 Madison 11 87.09 10 7 | 11 Woodson 11 0.55 13 5 12 West Springfie 12 86.58 10 5 | 12 West Potomac 12 0.54 3 11 13 Fairfax 13 86.02 6 5 | 13 Annandale 13 0.53 6 8 14 McLean 14 85.80 14 5 | 14 Robert E Lee 14 0.52 1 11 15 West Potomac 15 85.75 3 11 | 15 Marshall 15 0.51 5 7 16 Marshall 16 85.67 5 7 | 16 Herndon 16 0.50 12 4 17 Hayfield 17 85.42 4 8 | 17 T.C. Williams 17 0.48 7 4 18 Robert E Lee 18 85.26 1 11 | 18 Mount Vernon 18 0.48 10 4 19 Herndon 19 84.25 12 4 | 19 Fairfax 19 0.47 6 5 20 South Lakes 20 83.79 4 9 | 20 Washington-Lee 20 0.46 4 10 21 T.C. Williams 21 83.00 7 4 | 21 George Mason 21 0.46 7 7 22 George Mason 22 82.39 7 7 | 22 Edison 22 0.45 3 9 23 Edison 23 79.83 3 9 | 23 McLean 23 0.45 14 5 24 Mount Vernon 24 79.76 10 4 | 24 Falls Church 24 0.44 8 6 25 Washington-Lee 25 79.55 4 10 | 25 Langley 25 0.43 10 6 26 Yorktown 26 79.19 8 8 | 26 South Lakes 26 0.43 4 9 27 Wakefield HS 27 78.49 1 11 | 27 Wakefield HS 27 0.41 1 11 28 J.E.B. Stuart 28 78.26 1 11 | 28 J.E.B. Stuart 28 0.40 1 11 29 Falls Church 29 78.15 8 6 | 29 Yorktown 29 0.39 8 8