Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

boys 2004 Pa Dis III  09 23 22 17:58 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Hempfield ( 19 - 5 ) 1 1 1 62 . 0 %
2 Manheim Township ( 16 - 9 ) 2 2 2 29 . 0 %
3 Carlisle ( 12 - 8 ) 3 3 3 6 . 0 %
4 Lancaster Country Day ( 12 - 7 ) 5 6 4 3 . 0 %
5 Biglerville ( 0 - 6 ) 31 27 25 0 . 10 %
6 Bishop McDevitt ( 1 - 14 ) 24 13 31 0 . 10 %
7 Central Dauphin ( 10 - 7 ) 16 16 13 0 . 10 %
8 Columbia-Montour ( 0 - 7 ) 30 29 28 0 . 10 %
9 Central Susquehanna ( 9 - 7 ) 21 28 20 0 . 10 %
10 Conestoga Valley ( 10 - 4 ) 10 11 8 0 . 10 %
11 Cumberland Valley ( 13 - 5 ) 4 5 5 0 . 10 %
12 Dallastown ( 8 - 3 ) 20 19 12 0 . 10 %
13 Central Dauphin East ( 12 - 5 ) 6 9 6 0 . 10 %
14 Ephrata ( 10 - 12 ) 19 21 24 0 . 10 %
15 Harrisburg Academy ( 8 - 9 ) 15 8 14 0 . 10 %
16 Hershey ( 13 - 6 ) 9 17 9 0 . 10 %
17 Kennard-Dale ( 2 - 9 ) 26 25 29 0 . 10 %
18 Elizabethtown ( 2 - 11 ) 13 4 17 0 . 10 %
19 Lampeter-Strasburg ( 5 - 9 ) 23 14 22 0 . 10 %
20 Lower Dauphin ( 10 - 6 ) 12 10 10 0 . 10 %
21 Penn Manor ( 6 - 8 ) 7 7 15 0 . 10 %
22 Palmyra ( 1 - 11 ) 27 15 30 0 . 10 %
23 Red Lion ( 12 - 3 ) 8 12 7 0 . 10 %
24 State College ( 5 - 2 ) 29 30 19 0 . 10 %
25 Susquehannock ( 10 - 2 ) 11 26 11 0 . 10 %
26 South-Western ( 2 - 8 ) 28 23 26 0 . 10 %
27 Warwick ( 12 - 10 ) 17 18 21 0 . 10 %
28 West York ( 0 - 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 10 %
29 Central York ( 4 - 9 ) 22 22 23 0 . 10 %
30 York Suburban ( 8 - 6 ) 18 20 18 0 . 10 %
31 York Catholic ( 4 - 9 ) 25 24 27 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers