Contact Us
First slide
  • HOME
  • MEN
  • WOMEN
  • BOYS
  • GIRLS
  • Contact Us

boys 2004 New Hampshire I/II/III  09 23 22 17:55 PDT


Switch to RPI Method
Power Rating (PR)
Explanation
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Explanation
Quality Wins Factor(QWF)
Explanation
Championship Probability
Explanation
Power Ratings(PR)
Print Version
Strength Of Schedule (SOS)
Print Version
Quality Win Factor (QWF)
Print Version
Champ & Selection
Print Version
Rank Team PR SOS QWF Champion %
1 Pinkerton ( 19 - 1 ) 1 3 1 69 . 0 %
2 Concord ( 16 - 4 ) 2 1 2 12 . 0 %
3 Exeter HS ( 13 - 6 ) 3 7 6 10 . 0 %
4 Souhegan ( 15 - 6 ) 4 2 3 5 . 0 %
5 Londonderry ( 15 - 5 ) 5 5 5 4 . 0 %
6 Bishop Brady ( 3 - 10 ) 22 18 24 0 . 10 %
7 Bishop Guertin ( 10 - 9 ) 6 6 9 0 . 10 %
8 Bow ( 16 - 1 ) 7 19 4 0 . 10 %
9 Con-Val ( 8 - 6 ) 26 26 18 0 . 10 %
10 Derryfield ( 0 - 0 ) 0 0 0 0 . 10 %
11 Dover ( 6 - 12 ) 20 22 27 0 . 10 %
12 Hanover ( 5 - 12 ) 12 4 16 0 . 10 %
13 Hollis-Brookline ( 6 - 7 ) 27 32 23 0 . 10 %
14 John Stark ( 4 - 9 ) 31 24 28 0 . 10 %
15 Kearsarge ( 17 - 1 ) 8 27 7 0 . 10 %
16 Keene ( 13 - 7 ) 13 20 10 0 . 10 %
17 Kingswood ( 3 - 12 ) 21 16 29 0 . 10 %
18 Laconia ( 14 - 4 ) 15 25 11 0 . 10 %
19 Lebanon ( 11 - 7 ) 11 13 12 0 . 10 %
20 Manchester Central ( 6 - 10 ) 18 12 17 0 . 10 %
21 Manchester Memorial ( 2 - 13 ) 23 9 25 0 . 10 %
22 Manchester West ( 3 - 12 ) 25 10 21 0 . 10 %
23 Merrimack ( 7 - 11 ) 14 15 20 0 . 10 %
24 Milford ( 4 - 10 ) 30 28 30 0 . 10 %
25 Merrimack Valley ( 9 - 7 ) 24 23 19 0 . 10 %
26 Nashua ( 8 - 12 ) 9 8 14 0 . 10 %
27 Oyster River ( 14 - 5 ) 10 17 8 0 . 10 %
28 Portsmouth ( 7 - 7 ) 28 31 22 0 . 10 %
29 Salem ( 0 - 17 ) 29 11 31 0 . 10 %
30 Somersworth ( 0 - 13 ) 33 29 33 0 . 10 %
31 St Thomas Aquinas ( 7 - 7 ) 16 21 15 0 . 10 %
32 Trinity Manchester ( 3 - 10 ) 32 30 32 0 . 10 %
33 Winnacunnet ( 4 - 12 ) 19 14 26 0 . 10 %

© copyright 2021 Laxnumbers