boys 2004 Connecticut II pr

boys 2004 Connecticut II 09 23 22 17:53 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	East Lyme ( 21 - 1 )	1	16	1	40 . 0 %
2	Trumbull ( 11 - 8 )	2	5	3	22 . 0 %
3	New Milford ( 12 - 7 )	4	14	6	10 . 0 %
4	Housatonic Valley ( 11 - 3 )	3	19	4	8 . 0 %
5	Danbury ( 8 - 9 )	8	11	9	4 . 0 %
6	Masuk-Monroe ( 13 - 7 )	7	18	5	4 . 0 %
7	Northwest Catholic ( 12 - 6 )	6	34	12	4 . 0 %
8	Ledyard ( 11 - 6 )	10	17	10	2 . 0 %
9	New Fairfield ( 13 - 6 )	5	3	2	2 . 0 %
10	Brookfield ( 8 - 10 )	14	8	11	1 . 0 %
11	Farmington ( 11 - 9 )	9	4	8	1 . 0 %
12	Fitch-Groton ( 9 - 8 )	11	28	13	1 . 0 %
13	Notre Dame-Fairfield ( 12 - 7 )	12	12	7	1 . 0 %
14	Avon HS ( 3 - 13 )	25	10	25	0 . 10 %
15	Bethel ( 0 - 10 )	33	6	30	0 . 10 %
16	Granby ( 4 - 10 )	26	32	26	0 . 10 %
17	Hamden ( 3 - 14 )	24	13	24	0 . 10 %
18	Immaculate Danbury ( 2 - 11 )	29	9	27	0 . 10 %
19	Old Lyme ( 9 - 5 )	13	35	16	0 . 10 %
20	Morgan-Clinton ( 7 - 10 )	20	26	22	0 . 10 %
21	Norwich Free Academy ( 3 - 13 )	30	20	31	0 . 10 %
22	North Haven ( 4 - 12 )	22	24	23	0 . 10 %
23	Norwich Tech ( 0 - 14 )	35	27	35	0 . 10 %
24	Pomperaug-Southbury ( 1 - 15 )	32	15	33	0 . 10 %
25	Rockville ( 3 - 13 )	23	22	21	0 . 10 %
26	St Bernard ( 1 - 14 )	34	30	34	0 . 10 %
27	Suffield HS ( 7 - 10 )	18	23	19	0 . 10 %
28	St Joseph-Trumbull ( 4 - 12 )	17	1	18	0 . 10 %
29	Stonington ( 9 - 5 )	15	25	14	0 . 10 %
30	Stamford ( 0 - 14 )	28	7	29	0 . 10 %
31	Tolland ( 2 - 13 )	31	33	32	0 . 10 %
32	Woodstock Academy ( 8 - 8 )	21	29	15	0 . 10 %
33	West Haven ( 7 - 10 )	19	31	17	0 . 10 %
34	Weston ( 6 - 10 )	16	21	20	0 . 10 %
35	Westhill ( 2 - 14 )	27	2	28	0 . 10 %