UPDATED: 09-08-25 10:47 PDT

men Lexington 1
  
Lexington             
W-L: ( 7- 9) PR = 89.8524

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 225 A AC Flora (14- 4, 93.4) 3- 4 301 H Carolina Forest ( 7- 6, 85.5) 8- 7 303 A White Knoll ( 6- 7, 85.3) 17- 5 306 H Dutch Fork ( 4-11, 85.3) 18-11 308 A Dorman (15- 4, 93.3) 9-10 311 H Fort Mill ( 9- 7, 92.3) 7-15 314 A Riverside ( 5-10, 87.3) 9- 6 317 A Spring Valley ( 9- 7, 81.7) 10- 1 321 H Boiling Springs (13- 4, 95.3) 7-14 327 H Chapin (10- 7, 93.5) 8-14 402 A Blythewood ( 7- 8, 84.0) 12- 4 404 H Mauldin (13- 4, 93.2) 9-10 410 H River Bluff ( 9- 6, 89.8) 10-11 416 A Wando (12- 1, 99.7) 2-18 422 H Carolina Forest ( 7- 6, 85.5) 14- 1 424 A Wando (12- 1, 99.7) 2-11

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   225 A AC Flora                3- 4      -1    -4    +      2.90
   301 H Carolina Forest         8- 7       1     5    -     -3.67
   303 A White Knoll            17- 5      12     4           0.78
   306 H Dutch Fork             18-11       7     5           0.12
   308 A Dorman                  9-10      -1    -4    +      2.75
   311 H Fort Mill               7-15      -8    -2    -     -2.93
   314 A Riverside               9- 6       3     2           0.81
   317 A Spring Valley          10- 1       9     8           0.00
   321 H Boiling Springs         7-14      -7    -5           0.00
   327 H Chapin                  8-14      -6    -3          -1.65
   402 A Blythewood             12- 4       8     6           0.00
   404 H Mauldin                 9-10      -1    -3           1.98
   410 H River Bluff            10-11      -1     0          -1.40
   416 A Wando                   2-18     -16   -10           0.00
   422 H Carolina Forest        14- 1      13     5           0.33
   424 A Wando                   2-11      -9   -10           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   301 H Carolina Forest         8- 7       1     5    -     -3.67
   311 H Fort Mill               7-15      -8    -2    -     -2.93

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   225 A AC Flora                3- 4      -1    -4    +      2.90
   308 A Dorman                  9-10      -1    -4    +      2.75

Lexington Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora AC Flora AC Flora  
Academic Magnet Char Lexington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lexington
Aiken Lexington insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) Lexington
Atlantic Collegiate Lexington   Lexington
Beaufort Lexington   Lexington
Bishop England Bishop England tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Bishop England
Bluffton Lexington   Lexington
Blythewood Lexington Lexington  
Boiling Springs Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Byrnes Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 5)( 2- 4) Lexington
Camden Military Acad Lexington Lexington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Carolina Forest Lexington Lexington  
Catawba Ridge Lexington tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Lexington
Chapin Chapin Chapin  
Christ Church Episco Christ Church Episco Christ Church Episco   4- 3 vs 2- 5
Clover Clover Clover   4- 1 vs 1- 4
Dorman Dorman Dorman  
Dutch Fork Lexington Lexington  
Eastside Eastside insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 2- 3) Eastside
Fort Mill Fort Mill Fort Mill  
Fox Creek Lexington Lexington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Gilbert Lexington Lexington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Greenville Greenville tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) Greenville
Hammond School Lexington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lexington
Heathwood Hall Lexington tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Lexington
Hillcrest Lexington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Lexington
Hilton Head Hilton Head tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Hilton Head
Hilton Head Christia Lexington   Lexington
James Island Charter James Island Charter insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) James Island Charter
JL Mann Academy JL Mann Academy tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) JL Mann Academy
Laurence Manning Aca Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lexington
Legion Collegiate Ac Legion Collegiate Ac tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Legion Collegiate Ac
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Mauldin Mauldin Mauldin  
May River May River insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) May River
Myrtle Beach Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lexington
Nation Ford Nation Ford Nation Ford   4- 1 vs 2- 3
North Myrtle Beach Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lexington
Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Philip Simmons Lexington Lexington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Porter-Gaud
River Bluff River Bluff River Bluff  
Riverside Lexington Lexington  
Socastee Lexington tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) Lexington
Spartanburg Lexington tied - ( 2- 4) ( 2- 4) Lexington
Spring Valley Lexington Lexington  
St James Lexington tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Lexington
St Joseph Catholic Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lexington
TL Hanna Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Lexington
Trinity Collegiate Lexington Lexington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Waccamaw Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Lexington
Wade Hampton Lexington Lexington   3- 2 vs 0- 5
Wando Wando Wando  
Westside Lexington Lexington   4- 1 vs 0- 5
White Knoll Lexington Lexington  
Woodmont Lexington insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Lexington

PowerWise = 34


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 13.54

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A AC Flora        (14- 4, 93.4)     3- 4       -6.48      20.12       0.33         0.85            -5.20
   0 H Carolina Fores  ( 7- 6, 85.5)     8- 7      -14.39      12.22      -0.33         0.85            10.06
   0 A White Knoll     ( 6- 7, 85.3)    17- 5      -14.60      12.00       0.33         0.85            10.44
   0 H Dutch Fork      ( 4-11, 85.3)    18-11      -14.59      12.01      -0.33         0.85             9.89
   0 A Dorman          (15- 4, 93.3)     9-10       -6.64      19.97       0.33         0.85            -5.33
   0 H Fort Mill       ( 9- 7, 92.3)     7-15       -7.64      18.96      -0.33         0.85            -6.75
   0 A Riverside       ( 5-10, 87.3)     9- 6      -12.58      14.03       0.33         0.85            12.16
   0 A Spring Valley   ( 9- 7, 81.7)    10- 1      -18.23       8.38       0.33         0.85             7.38
   0 H Boiling Spring  (13- 4, 95.3)     7-14       -4.56      22.04      -0.33         0.85            -4.14
   0 H Chapin          (10- 7, 93.5)     8-14       -6.37      20.24      -0.33         0.85            -5.67
   0 A Blythewood      ( 7- 8, 84.0)    12- 4      -15.95      10.66       0.33         0.85             9.30
   0 H Mauldin         (13- 4, 93.2)     9-10       -6.74      19.87      -0.33         0.85            -5.98
   0 H River Bluff     ( 9- 6, 89.8)    10-11      -10.11      16.49      -0.33         0.85            -8.84
   0 A Wando           (12- 1, 99.7)     2-18       -0.19      26.42       0.33         0.85            -0.12
   0 H Carolina Fores  ( 7- 6, 85.5)    14- 1      -14.39      12.22      -0.33         0.85            10.06
   0 A Wando           (12- 1, 99.7)     2-11       -0.19      26.42       0.33         0.85            -0.12
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        27.11

winning pts = 69.2871 losing points = -42.1767

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------