All ratings/rankings on this page are based on the state (not league) championships.
Conf =
Nickname = Coach =GAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 63.1300011 home-field advantage = -1.12 Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 304 H Central Hardin ( 3-10, 53.6) 15- 1 307 A Paul Laurence Dunbar (14- 5, 67.1) 6- 9 313 H Mercy Academy (12-10, 64.8) 7- 8 314 A Lexington Christian (12- 3, 61.1) 10- 8 317 A Bryan Station ( 7-10, 59.3) 6- 1 320 H North Oldham ( 7-10, 60.7) 8- 3 321 A Christian Academy ( 6- 8, 66.9) 6- 8 322 A Ballard ( 4-10, 65.5) 5- 4 322 H Atherton ( 5-15, 59.6) 3- 6 324 A Woodford County ( 5- 9, 59.8) 10- 7 326 H Oldham County (14- 6, 67.7) 5-15 327 H Bryan Station ( 7-10, 59.3) 13- 7 414 H Atherton ( 5-15, 59.6) 12- 8 417 A Shelby County ( 6-10, 59.7) 10- 9 424 H South Oldham ( 6-14, 65.2) 5- 9 430 H Frederick Douglass ( 8- 9, 60.3) 11- 2 505 H Tates Creek ( 1-12, 53.8) 8- 2 507 H Scott County ( 1-10, 52.9) 15- 4 509 N South Oldham ( 6-14, 65.2) 3- 5
PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction. N/A when ten | | goal limit is exceeded | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 304 H Central Hardin 15- 1 14 10 0.00 307 A Paul Laurence Dunbar 6- 9 -3 -5 + 2.11 313 H Mercy Academy 7- 8 -1 0 -0.47 314 A Lexington Christian 10- 8 2 0 1.09 317 A Bryan Station 6- 1 5 2 + 2.30 320 H North Oldham 8- 3 5 3 1.48 321 A Christian Academy 6- 8 -2 -4 + 2.90 322 A Ballard 5- 4 1 -3 ++ 4.45 322 H Atherton 3- 6 -3 4 --- -7.63 324 A Woodford County 10- 7 3 2 0.76 326 H Oldham County 5-15 -10 -3 - -3.56 327 H Bryan Station 13- 7 6 4 1.06 414 H Atherton 12- 8 4 4 -0.63 417 A Shelby County 10- 9 1 2 -1.31 424 H South Oldham 5- 9 -4 0 - -3.07 430 H Frederick Douglass 11- 2 9 3 + 3.04 505 H Tates Creek 8- 2 6 10 -1.00 507 H Scott County 15- 4 11 11 0.00 509 N South Oldham 3- 5 -2 -2 0.05UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Power Rating............. 63.13 Power Rank................. 17 SOS (PR) Rating.......... 29.54 SOS (PR) Rank.............. 29 SOS (RPI) Rating......... .5000 SOS (RPI) Rank............. 24 RPI Rating............... .4786 RPI Rank................... 19 Champ. Probability ...... 0.0 Championship Rank ......... 15 Selection sum ........... 64 Selection Rank ............ 21 Qual Win (PR) Rating..... -35. Qual Win (PR) Rank......... 20 Qual Win (RPI) Rating.... -35. Qual Win (RPI) Rank........ 21 PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals ..... 8.3 Ave Defensive Goals ....... 6.1 Wins/Losses(all )...... 12- 7 Ave Goal diff (all )..... 2.2 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 0- 2 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... -6.5 Wins/Losses(top 20)...... 2- 6 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... -2.4 Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 2- 1 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... 5.0