Cape Henlopen
W-L: (12- 2) PR = 96.1136Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 325 H Sussex Central ( 1-11, 71.4) 22- 0 328 A Polytech ( 7- 8, 80.5) 18- 2 404 H Caesar Rodney (12- 3, 91.7) 16- 9 409 A Dover ( 3-12, 78.3) 18- 3 411 H Milford ( 8- 7, 84.9) 22- 2 414 A Salesianum School ( 8- 0, 99.9) 5-15 428 H Wilmington Friends (11- 6, 88.7) 15- 2 501 A Archmere Academy (10- 5, 89.8) 16- 5 502 H Smyrna (10- 6, 86.9) 14- 2 509 A Sussex Tech (10- 5, 82.4) 21- 1 520 H Sanford School ( 7- 9, 85.1) 20- 2 524 H Archmere Academy (10- 5, 89.8) 11- 3 528 H Tatnall School (14- 4, 91.0) 11- 3 531 N Salesianum School ( 8- 0, 99.9) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
325 H Sussex Central 22- 0 22 25 0.00
328 A Polytech 18- 2 16 15 0.00
404 H Caesar Rodney 16- 9 7 5 0.41
409 A Dover 18- 3 15 18 0.00
411 H Milford 22- 2 20 11 0.00
414 A Salesianum School 5-15 -10 -4 -1.00
428 H Wilmington Friends 15- 2 13 8 0.00
501 A Archmere Academy 16- 5 11 6 0.00
502 H Smyrna 14- 2 12 9 0.00
509 A Sussex Tech 21- 1 20 13 0.00
520 H Sanford School 20- 2 18 11 0.00
524 H Archmere Academy 11- 3 8 7 0.00
528 H Tatnall School 11- 3 8 5 0.00
531 N Salesianum School 9-12 -3 -4 0.79
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Cape Henlopen Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexis I du Pont | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Appoquinimink | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Archmere Academy | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Brandywine | Cape Henlopen | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cape Henlopen | |
| Caesar Rodney | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Caravel Academy | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Concord | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Conrad School | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Delaware Military Ac | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Delcastle | Cape Henlopen | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Henlopen | |
| Delmar | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Dover | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| First State Military | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Hodgson Vo-Tech | Cape Henlopen | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cape Henlopen | |
| Indian River | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| McKean | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Middletown | Cape Henlopen | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cape Henlopen | |
| Milford | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Mount Pleasant | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Newark Charter | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Odessa | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Polytech | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Red Lion Christian | Cape Henlopen | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cape Henlopen | |
| Salesianum School | Salesianum School | Salesianum School | ||
| Sanford School | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Smyrna | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| St Andrews School | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| St Georges Tech | Cape Henlopen | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cape Henlopen | |
| St Marks | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Sussex Academy | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Sussex Central | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Sussex Tech | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Tatnall School | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Tower Hill School | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Wilmington Charter | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Wilmington Christian | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Wilmington Friends | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Woodbridge | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 1- 3 |
PowerWise = 37
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.36
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Sussex Central ( 1-11, 71.4) 22- 0 -28.49 6.69 -0.21 1.03 6.64
0 A Polytech ( 7- 8, 80.5) 18- 2 -19.35 15.82 0.21 1.03 16.44
0 H Caesar Rodney (12- 3, 91.7) 16- 9 -8.17 27.00 -0.21 1.03 27.48
0 A Dover ( 3-12, 78.3) 18- 3 -21.55 13.62 0.21 1.03 14.18
0 H Milford ( 8- 7, 84.9) 22- 2 -15.00 20.17 -0.21 1.03 20.47
0 A Salesianum Sch ( 8- 0, 99.9) 5-15 -0.00 35.17 0.21 1.03 -0.21
0 H Wilmington Fri (11- 6, 88.7) 15- 2 -11.17 24.01 -0.21 1.03 24.41
0 A Archmere Acade (10- 5, 89.8) 16- 5 -10.15 25.03 0.21 1.03 25.88
0 H Smyrna (10- 6, 86.9) 14- 2 -12.96 22.21 -0.21 1.03 22.57
0 A Sussex Tech (10- 5, 82.4) 21- 1 -17.46 17.71 0.21 1.03 18.38
0 H Sanford School ( 7- 9, 85.1) 20- 2 -14.78 20.39 -0.21 1.03 20.70
0 H Archmere Acade (10- 5, 89.8) 11- 3 -10.15 25.03 -0.21 1.03 25.45
0 H Tatnall School (14- 4, 91.0) 11- 3 -8.92 26.25 -0.21 1.03 26.71
0 N Salesianum Sch ( 8- 0, 99.9) 9-12 -0.00 35.17 -0.00 1.03 -0.00
------
249.11
|
winning pts = 249.3286 losing points = -0.2140
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------