Cedar Valley
W-L: (12- 6) PR = 89.0139Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 305 A Copper Hills ( 5-11, 86.0) 14-12 311 A American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 9- 5 314 H Pleasant Grove ( 4-16, 85.6) 16- 6 319 A Timpanogos (11- 7, 86.1) 13- 3 321 H Provo ( 1-18, 78.9) 17- 2 325 A Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 6-11 326 H Lehi ( 8- 9, 86.0) 11- 7 409 H Roy ( 4-14, 84.5) 10- 5 415 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 8-14 418 A Wasatch ( 9-10, 89.7) 6- 5 423 H Timpview (12- 7, 88.8) 6-14 425 A East (10-10, 91.0) 10-14 430 A Salem Hills ( 4-12, 85.8) 15- 3 502 A Spanish Fork (11- 9, 89.2) 12-17 507 H Springville ( 6-11, 84.9) 22-11 509 H Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 12- 7 513 H Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 19- 1 515 A Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 4- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
305 A Copper Hills 14-12 2 2 -0.49
311 A American Fork 9- 5 4 3 0.73
314 H Pleasant Grove 16- 6 10 4 1.02
319 A Timpanogos 13- 3 10 2 + 2.58
321 H Provo 17- 2 15 11 0.00
325 A Mountain Ridge 6-11 -5 -3 -1.84
326 H Lehi 11- 7 4 4 0.44
409 H Roy 10- 5 5 5 0.00
415 A Bingham 8-14 -6 -1 -- -4.30
418 A Wasatch 6- 5 1 -1 + 2.17
423 H Timpview 6-14 -8 1 -- -5.78
425 A East 10-14 -4 -3 -1.47
430 A Salem Hills 15- 3 12 3 + 2.27
502 A Spanish Fork 12-17 -5 -1 -- -4.31
507 H Springville 22-11 11 5 0.34
509 H Maple Mountain 12- 7 5 -2 +++ 7.33
513 H Bonneville 19- 1 18 10 0.00
515 A Maple Mountain 4- 6 -2 -3 1.38
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 415 A Bingham 8-14 -6 -1 -- -4.30 423 H Timpview 6-14 -8 1 -- -5.78 502 A Spanish Fork 12-17 -5 -1 -- -4.31 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 509 H Maple Mountain 12- 7 5 -2 +++ 7.33 319 A Timpanogos 13- 3 10 2 + 2.58 418 A Wasatch 6- 5 1 -1 + 2.17 430 A Salem Hills 15- 3 12 3 + 2.27 |
Cedar Valley Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta | Alta | Alta 4- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| American Fork | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Bear River | Bear River | Bear River | ||
| Bingham | Bingham | Bingham | ||
| Bonneville | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Bountiful | Bountiful | Bountiful 6- 1 vs 4- 3 | ||
| Box Elder | Box Elder | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) | Box Elder | |
| Brighton | Brighton | Brighton 3- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Canyon View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Cedar | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Clearfield | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 3- 3) | Cedar Valley | |
| Copper Hills | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon | Corner Canyon 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Crimson Cliffs | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Davis | Davis | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Davis | |
| Desert Hills | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dixie | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Cedar Valley | |
| East | East | East | ||
| Farmington | Farmington | Farmington | ||
| Fremont | Fremont | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Fremont | |
| Green Canyon | Green Canyon | Green Canyon | ||
| Herriman | Herriman | Herriman 4- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Highland | Highland | Highland 5- 1 vs 2- 4 | ||
| Hillcrest | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Hurricane | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Jordan | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Juan Diego Catholic | Juan Diego Catholic | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Juan Diego Catholic | |
| Judge Memorial Catho | Judge Memorial Catho | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Judge Memorial Catho | |
| Layton | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Lehi | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Logan | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Lone Peak | Lone Peak | Lone Peak 8- 0 vs 6- 3 | ||
| Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain | Maple Mountain 8- 1 vs 6- 3 | ||
| Mountain Crest | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Cedar Valley | |
| Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | Mountain Ridge | ||
| Mountain View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 5- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Northridge | Northridge | Northridge 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Olympus | Olympus | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 0) | Olympus | |
| Orem | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Park City | Park City | Park City 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Payson | Payson | tied - ( 6- 2) ( 6- 2) | Payson | |
| Pine View | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Pleasant Grove | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Provo | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Ridgeline | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 1) | Cedar Valley | |
| Riverton | Cedar Valley | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Cedar Valley | |
| Roy | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Salem Hills | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Sky View | Sky View | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Sky View | |
| Skyline | Skyline | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Skyline | |
| Skyridge | Skyridge | Skyridge 8- 0 vs 5- 3 | ||
| Snow Canyon | Snow Canyon | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Snow Canyon | |
| Spanish Fork | Spanish Fork | Spanish Fork | ||
| Springville | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Syracuse | Cedar Valley | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cedar Valley | |
| Timpanogos | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Timpview | Timpview | Timpview | ||
| Viewmont | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 4- 3 vs 2- 5 | ||
| Wasatch | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley | ||
| Waterford | Waterford | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) | Waterford | |
| Weber | Weber | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Weber | |
| West | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| West Field | West Field | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | West Field | |
| West Jordan | Cedar Valley | Cedar Valley 3- 3 vs 0- 6 | ||
| Westlake | Cedar Valley | insuffient: ( 8- 3)( 7- 3) | Cedar Valley | |
| Woods Cross | Woods Cross | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 1) | Woods Cross |
PowerWise = 33
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 18.63
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Copper Hills ( 5-11, 86.0) 14-12 -13.90 15.61 0.53 1.03 16.70
0 A American Fork ( 4-15, 85.2) 9- 5 -14.68 14.83 0.53 1.03 15.89
0 H Pleasant Grove ( 4-16, 85.6) 16- 6 -14.34 15.17 -0.53 1.03 15.15
0 A Timpanogos (11- 7, 86.1) 13- 3 -13.83 15.68 0.53 1.03 16.76
0 H Provo ( 1-18, 78.9) 17- 2 -20.98 8.53 -0.53 1.03 8.29
0 A Mountain Ridge (14- 6, 91.6) 6-11 -8.26 21.25 0.53 1.03 -8.00
0 H Lehi ( 8- 9, 86.0) 11- 7 -13.92 15.59 -0.53 1.03 15.59
0 H Roy ( 4-14, 84.5) 10- 5 -15.41 14.10 -0.53 1.03 14.05
0 A Bingham ( 8-11, 89.2) 8-14 -10.71 18.80 0.53 1.03 -10.54
0 A Wasatch ( 9-10, 89.7) 6- 5 -10.24 19.27 0.53 1.03 20.49
0 H Timpview (12- 7, 88.8) 6-14 -11.15 18.37 -0.53 1.03 -12.08
0 A East (10-10, 91.0) 10-14 -8.88 20.63 0.53 1.03 -8.65
0 A Salem Hills ( 4-12, 85.8) 15- 3 -14.14 15.37 0.53 1.03 16.45
0 A Spanish Fork (11- 9, 89.2) 12-17 -10.73 18.78 0.53 1.03 -10.56
0 H Springville ( 6-11, 84.9) 22-11 -15.02 14.49 -0.53 1.03 14.45
0 H Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 12- 7 -8.03 21.48 -0.53 1.03 21.68
0 H Bonneville ( 1-17, 79.2) 19- 1 -20.75 8.76 -0.53 1.03 8.52
0 A Maple Mountain (13- 7, 91.9) 4- 6 -8.03 21.48 0.53 1.03 -7.77
------
126.43
|
winning pts = 184.0207 losing points = -57.5886
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------