2015 NCAA Men's Division II Strength of Schedule ARC

Based on Power Ratings Based on RPI
Rank Team SOS W L | Rank Team SOS W L Rnk Value | Rnk Value | 1 Le Moyne 1 84.30 16 3 | 1 Le Moyne 1 0.76 16 3 2 Adelphi 2 84.13 15 3 | 2 Lake Erie 2 0.75 15 3 3 Merrimack 3 83.98 13 3 | 3 Limestone 3 0.74 20 1 4 Lake Erie 4 83.65 15 3 | 4 Adelphi 4 0.73 15 3 5 Saint Anselm 5 83.61 2 11 | 5 Merrimack 5 0.71 13 3 6 Queens U. of C 6 83.18 9 8 | 6 LIU Post 6 0.69 14 3 7 Saint Michael' 7 82.99 7 7 | 7 Seton Hill 7 0.67 9 5 8 S. New Hampshi 8 82.83 2 13 | 8 Mount Olive 8 0.66 11 5 9 Pace 9 82.79 9 7 | 9 Queens U. of C 9 0.66 9 8 10 Seton Hill 10 82.70 9 5 | 10 NYIT 10 0.66 12 4 11 Limestone 11 82.69 20 1 | 11 Mercyhurst 11 0.66 8 6 12 Saint Rose 12 82.48 4 10 | 12 Assumption 12 0.64 9 8 13 Bentley 13 82.46 6 7 | 13 Pfeiffer 13 0.63 10 5 14 Mercyhurst 14 82.31 8 6 | 14 Pace 14 0.63 9 7 15 LIU Post 15 82.28 14 3 | 15 Belmont Abbey 15 0.62 11 5 16 NYIT 16 82.24 12 4 | 16 Lenoir-Rhyne 16 0.62 9 7 17 Tampa 17 82.21 15 4 | 17 S. New Hampshi 17 0.62 2 13 18 Florida Southe 18 82.15 6 8 | 18 Saint Anselm 18 0.61 2 11 19 Assumption 19 82.08 9 8 | 19 Rollins 19 0.61 6 10 20 Rollins 20 81.95 6 10 | 20 Franklin Pierc 20 0.61 12 4 21 Dowling 21 81.92 5 8 | 21 Saint Michael' 21 0.61 7 7 22 Lenoir-Rhyne 22 81.71 9 7 | 22 Florida Southe 22 0.61 6 8 23 Lindenwood 23 81.59 14 4 | 23 Tampa 23 0.60 15 4 24 American Inter 24 81.57 2 13 | 24 Mercy 24 0.59 10 7 25 Mount Olive 25 81.53 11 5 | 25 Dowling 25 0.59 5 8 26 Mercy 26 81.49 10 7 | 26 Catawba 26 0.58 5 10 27 Franklin Pierc 27 81.47 12 4 | 27 Saint Leo 27 0.58 7 7 28 Saint Leo 28 81.12 7 7 | 28 Saint Rose 28 0.58 4 10 29 Pfeiffer 29 81.06 10 5 | 29 Bentley 29 0.58 6 7 30 Florida Tech 30 81.05 12 4 | 30 American Inter 30 0.58 2 13 31 Catawba 31 81.02 5 10 | 31 Mars Hill 31 0.57 10 6 32 Adams State 32 80.91 4 11 | 32 Adams State 32 0.55 4 11 33 Chestnut Hill 33 80.72 6 7 | 33 Roberts Wesley 33 0.55 4 11 34 Wingate 34 80.62 6 10 | 34 Florida Tech 34 0.55 12 4 35 Walsh 35 80.56 3 10 | 35 Wheeling Jesui 35 0.54 8 6 36 Coker 36 80.43 9 5 | 36 Molloy 36 0.54 11 4 37 U. of DC 37 80.22 2 9 | 37 North Greenvil 37 0.54 1 14 38 Mars Hill 38 80.22 10 6 | 38 Lindenwood 38 0.54 14 4 39 Molloy 39 80.19 11 4 | 39 Coker 39 0.53 9 5 40 Belmont Abbey 40 80.12 11 5 | 40 Chestnut Hill 40 0.53 6 7 41 Roberts Wesley 41 80.08 4 11 | 41 Lees-McRae 41 0.52 2 14 42 CSU Pueblo 42 80.06 1 11 | 42 Lynn 42 0.52 8 7 43 Lynn 43 80.06 8 7 | 43 Ohio Valley 43 0.52 0 15 44 Ohio Valley 44 79.76 0 15 | 44 Tusculum 44 0.52 5 8 45 Dominican C. 45 79.70 1 12 | 45 Emmanuel (GA) 45 0.52 3 10 46 Colorado Mesa 46 79.63 10 3 | 46 Walsh 46 0.51 3 10 47 Emmanuel (GA) 47 79.55 3 10 | 47 Wingate 47 0.51 6 10 48 Wheeling Jesui 48 79.55 8 6 | 48 Alderson Broad 48 0.50 4 9 49 North Greenvil 49 79.35 1 14 | 49 Brevard 49 0.50 8 8 50 Tusculum 50 79.08 5 8 | 50 U. of DC 50 0.49 2 9 51 Lees-McRae 51 78.93 2 14 | 51 Dominican C. 51 0.47 1 12 52 Alderson Broad 52 78.63 4 9 | 52 Post 52 0.47 6 8 53 Post 53 78.11 6 8 | 53 CSU Pueblo 53 0.46 1 11 54 Shorter 54 78.07 8 7 | 54 Shorter 54 0.46 8 7 55 Brevard 55 77.87 8 8 | 55 Colorado Mesa 55 0.41 10 3 56 Rockhurst 56 77.73 7 5 | 56 Notre Dame de 56 0.38 3 12 57 Notre Dame de 57 77.35 3 12 | 57 Lincoln Memori 57 0.38 4 10 58 Lincoln Memori 58 77.14 4 10 | 58 Young Harris 58 0.33 9 7 59 Young Harris 59 75.65 9 7 | 59 Rockhurst 59 0.29 7 5