2006 boys New Hampshire I/II/I pr

2006 boys New Hampshire I/II/III 09 23 22 18:10 PDT

Switch to RPI Method

Power Rating (PR) Explanation	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Explanation	Quality Wins Factor(QWF) Explanation	Championship Probability Explanation
Power Ratings(PR) Print Version	Strength Of Schedule (SOS) Print Version	Quality Win Factor (QWF) Print Version	Champ & Selection Print Version

Rank	Team	PR	SOS	QWF	Champion %
1	Pinkerton ( 20 - 0 )	1	1	1	31 . 0 %
2	Bishop Guertin ( 17 - 3 )	2	11	2	29 . 0 %
3	Exeter HS ( 14 - 6 )	3	5	5	11 . 0 %
4	Bow ( 13 - 4 )	4	15	6	10 . 0 %
5	Concord ( 14 - 5 )	5	2	3	4 . 0 %
6	St Thomas Aquinas ( 14 - 4 )	7	9	4	4 . 0 %
7	Nashua South ( 13 - 6 )	6	25	10	3 . 0 %
8	Hanover ( 11 - 7 )	9	12	11	2 . 0 %
9	Hollis-Brookline ( 16 - 3 )	14	37	12	2 . 0 %
10	Souhegan ( 12 - 8 )	8	14	9	2 . 0 %
11	Lebanon ( 12 - 5 )	11	4	7	1 . 0 %
12	Winnacunnet ( 6 - 8 )	16	19	21	1 . 0 %
13	Bishop Brady ( 9 - 5 )	13	18	13	0 . 10 %
14	Con-Val ( 6 - 7 )	27	31	24	0 . 10 %
15	Dover ( 5 - 12 )	20	21	27	0 . 10 %
16	Gilford ( 5 - 11 )	35	28	34	0 . 10 %
17	Hopkinton ( 12 - 5 )	18	38	18	0 . 10 %
18	John Stark ( 1 - 11 )	36	34	36	0 . 10 %
19	Kearsarge ( 15 - 1 )	15	36	8	0 . 10 %
20	Keene ( 3 - 13 )	29	13	26	0 . 10 %
21	Kingswood ( 1 - 10 )	28	17	29	0 . 10 %
22	Laconia ( 12 - 4 )	21	33	16	0 . 10 %
23	Londonderry ( 8 - 11 )	12	3	17	0 . 10 %
24	Manchester Central ( 6 - 9 )	19	22	19	0 . 10 %
25	Manchester Memorial ( 0 - 13 )	33	8	33	0 . 10 %
26	Manchester West ( 2 - 13 )	31	10	28	0 . 10 %
27	Merrimack ( 2 - 12 )	22	6	30	0 . 10 %
28	Milford ( 3 - 9 )	34	30	31	0 . 10 %
29	Merrimack Valley ( 9 - 6 )	23	27	20	0 . 10 %
30	Nashua North ( 1 - 16 )	30	7	35	0 . 10 %
31	Oyster River ( 11 - 6 )	10	24	14	0 . 10 %
32	Pelham ( 1 - 12 )	38	26	37	0 . 10 %
33	Portsmouth ( 8 - 7 )	26	29	23	0 . 10 %
34	Salem ( 5 - 10 )	25	20	22	0 . 10 %
35	Somersworth ( 2 - 12 )	37	35	38	0 . 10 %
36	Spaulding ( 2 - 10 )	24	16	25	0 . 10 %
37	Timberlane ( 9 - 6 )	17	23	15	0 . 10 %
38	Trinity Manchester ( 4 - 9 )	32	32	32	0 . 10 %