All ratings/rankings on this page are based on the state (not league) championships.
Conf =
Nickname = Coach =GAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 70.0699997 home-field advantage = -0.23 Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 315 H Council Rock North ( 9- 8, 76.2) 4-11 318 H Strath Haven ( 4-12, 74.3) 4- 7 321 A Central Bucks West (14- 4, 83.2) 1-15 325 A Upper Merion (12- 7, 77.5) 5-15 326 A Council Rock South (11- 6, 78.1) 5-15 404 H Cheltenham ( 1-12, 61.1) 16- 0 408 H Coatesville ( 6-12, 74.7) 6-11 411 A Upper Dublin (13- 4, 84.9) 1-14 413 H Avon Grove (11- 7, 81.2) 4-16 415 H Holy Ghost Prep ( 8- 9, 73.9) 4- 9 416 H William Tennent ( 3-13, 61.8) 11- 4 418 A Plymouth-Whitemarsh (12- 6, 75.8) 6-14 422 A Hatboro-Horsham ( 5-13, 69.8) 10- 6 423 H New Hope-Solebury ( 5-12, 68.9) 7- 2 425 A Wissahickon (11- 6, 73.5) 5- 9 430 H Upper Moreland ( 8- 9, 69.9) 11- 5 502 A Springfield Twp (13- 5, 74.3) 6-12 507 A Quakertown ( 6-12, 69.1) 6- 8
PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction. N/A when ten | | goal limit is exceeded | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 315 H Council Rock North 4-11 -7 -5 -1.09 318 H Strath Haven 4- 7 -3 -4 1.05 321 A Central Bucks West 1-15 -14 -13 0.00 325 A Upper Merion 5-15 -10 -7 0.00 326 A Council Rock South 5-15 -10 -8 0.00 404 H Cheltenham 16- 0 16 9 0.00 408 H Coatesville 6-11 -5 -4 -0.61 411 A Upper Dublin 1-14 -13 -15 0.00 413 H Avon Grove 4-16 -12 -10 0.00 415 H Holy Ghost Prep 4- 9 -5 -3 -1.36 416 H William Tennent 11- 4 7 8 0.00 418 A Plymouth-Whitemarsh 6-14 -8 -5 -1.05 422 A Hatboro-Horsham 10- 6 4 0 + 3.98 423 H New Hope-Solebury 7- 2 5 1 + 3.61 425 A Wissahickon 5- 9 -4 -3 -0.35 430 H Upper Moreland 11- 5 6 0 ++ 5.63 502 A Springfield Twp 6-12 -6 -4 -1.54 507 A Quakertown 6- 8 -2 0 - -2.71UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Power Rating............. 70.07 Power Rank................. 114 SOS (PR) Rating.......... 47.40 SOS (PR) Rank.............. 71 SOS (RPI) Rating......... .5810 SOS (RPI) Rank............. 113 RPI Rating............... .4201 RPI Rank................... 168 Champ. Probability ...... 0.0 Championship Rank ......... 17 Selection sum ........... 487 Selection Rank ............ 172 Qual Win (PR) Rating..... -295. Qual Win (PR) Rank......... 201 Qual Win (RPI) Rating.... -300. Qual Win (RPI) Rank........ 206 PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals ..... 6.2 Ave Defensive Goals ....... 9.6 Wins/Losses(all )...... 5-13 Ave Goal diff (all )..... -3.4 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... Wins/Losses(top 20)...... 0- 1 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... -13.0 Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 1- 2 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... -0.7